Arkoosh Maire Kathryn, Derby K Mark, Wacker David P, Berg Wendy, McLaughlin T F, Barretto Anjali
Gonzaga University, Spokane Washington 99258-0025, USA.
Behav Modif. 2007 Nov;31(6):880-95. doi: 10.1177/0145445507302254.
The validity of selecting treatment contingencies on the basis of the results obtained through functional analysis is well documented. However, a number of second-generation questions have emerged: For example, what are the parameters required to achieve desired treatment outcomes? More specifically, what is the degree of treatment integrity needed for the successful reduction of problem behavior? This study had two purposes: to describe the relationship between treatment integrity levels and treatment effectiveness and to highlight the importance of reporting the treatment integrity in outcome-based research. The results indicate that a high level of treatment integrity is required for treatment success. Furthermore, the authors found that very low levels of integrity may be required for behavioral reduction procedures (i.e., extinction) if high levels of reinforcement are provided.
基于功能分析所得结果来选择治疗意外情况的有效性已有充分记录。然而,一些第二代问题已经出现:例如,实现期望的治疗结果所需的参数是什么?更具体地说,成功减少问题行为所需的治疗完整性程度是多少?本研究有两个目的:描述治疗完整性水平与治疗效果之间的关系,并强调在基于结果的研究中报告治疗完整性的重要性。结果表明,治疗成功需要高水平的治疗完整性。此外,作者发现,如果提供高水平的强化,行为减少程序(即消退)可能需要非常低水平的完整性。