Suppr超能文献

在转移性尿路上皮癌患者中,高剂量强度甲氨蝶呤、长春碱、阿霉素和顺铂联合疗法(HD-MVAC)相对于传统MVAC可能具有生存获益。

Possible survival benefit of high-dose-intensity methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, and cisplatin combination therapy (HD-MVAC) over conventional MVAC in metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients.

作者信息

Inoue Takamitsu, Obara Takashi, Saito Mitsuru, Kumazawa Teruaki, Yuasa Takeshi, Matuura Shinobu, Tsuchiya Norihiko, Satoh Shigeru, Habuchi Tomonori

机构信息

The Department of Urology, Akita University School of Medicine.

出版信息

Hinyokika Kiyo. 2007 Sep;53(9):613-8.

Abstract

Eight patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma received high-dose (HD)-MVAC therapy, which consisted of methotrexate (30 mg/m2) on day 1, vinblastine (3 mg/m2) on day 2, doxorubicin (30 mg/m2) on day 2 and cisplatin (70 mg/m2) on day 2 (14-day cycle). Patients were treated with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (100 microg) subcutaneously from day 4 to 10. For comparison, 7 patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma who received conventional (C)-MVAC (28-day cycle) were enrolled in this study. Overall survival in the HD-MVAC group was significantly better than that in the C-MVAC group (p = 0.012, log rank test). The overall response rate for measurable metastatic lesions was similar in both groups (HD-MVAC, 62.5% vs. C-MVAC, 57.1%, p =0.622). The patients in the HD-MVAC group were able to receive significantly more courses than the C-MVAC group (HD-MVAC, median 3 courses vs. C-MVAC, 2 courses, p=0.045, Student's t test). The frequency of grade 3/4 toxicities was not statistically different between the 2 groups. HD-MVAC therapy rather than C-MVAC therapy may be advocated as a first-line chemotherapy for metastatic patients, since HD-MVAC is associated with a shorter period required for each course, a lower frequency of dose reduction and a possible benefit in terms of overall survival.

摘要

8例转移性尿路上皮癌患者接受了大剂量(HD)-MVAC治疗,具体方案为第1天给予甲氨蝶呤(30mg/m²)、第2天给予长春碱(3mg/m²)、第2天给予阿霉素(30mg/m²)以及第2天给予顺铂(70mg/m²)(14天为一个周期)。从第4天至第10天,患者接受皮下注射粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)(100μg)治疗。为作比较,本研究纳入了7例接受传统(C)-MVAC(28天周期)治疗的转移性尿路上皮癌患者。HD-MVAC组的总生存期显著优于C-MVAC组(p = 0.012,对数秩检验)。两组中可测量转移性病灶的总体缓解率相似(HD-MVAC组为62.5%,C-MVAC组为57.1%,p = 0.622)。HD-MVAC组患者能够接受的疗程显著多于C-MVAC组(HD-MVAC组,中位数为3个疗程;C-MVAC组为2个疗程,p = 0.045,Student's t检验)。两组3/4级毒性反应的发生率无统计学差异。HD-MVAC治疗而非C-MVAC治疗可被推荐作为转移性患者的一线化疗方案,因为HD-MVAC每个疗程所需时间更短,剂量减少的频率更低,且可能在总生存期方面具有优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验