Wang Wentao, Meng Bingjun, Lu Xiaoxia, Liu Yu, Tao Shu
Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes, College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China.
Anal Chim Acta. 2007 Oct 29;602(2):211-22. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2007.09.023. Epub 2007 Sep 19.
The methods of simultaneous extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and organochlorine pesticides (OCPs) from soils using Soxhlet extraction, microwave-assisted extraction (MAE) and accelerated solvent extraction (ASE) were established, and the extraction efficiencies using the three methods were systemically compared from procedural blank, limits of detection and quantification, method recovery and reproducibility, method chromatogram and other factors. In addition, soils with different total organic carbon contents were used to test the extraction efficiencies of the three methods. The results showed that the values obtained in this study were comparable with the values reported by other studies. In some respects such as method recovery and reproducibility, there were no significant differences among the three methods for the extraction of PAHs and OCPs. In some respects such as procedural blank and limits of detection and quantification, there were significant differences among the three methods. Overall, ASE had the best extraction efficiency compared to MAE and Soxhlet extraction, and the extraction efficiencies of MAE and Soxhlet extraction were comparable to each other depending on the property such as TOC content of the studied soil. Considering other factors such as solvent consumption and extraction time, ASE and MAE are preferable to Soxhlet extraction.
建立了索氏提取法、微波辅助萃取(MAE)法和加速溶剂萃取(ASE)法从土壤中同时提取多环芳烃(PAHs)和有机氯农药(OCPs)的方法,并从程序空白、检测限和定量限、方法回收率和重现性、方法色谱图等方面系统比较了这三种方法的提取效率。此外,还使用了不同总有机碳含量的土壤来测试这三种方法的提取效率。结果表明,本研究获得的值与其他研究报告的值具有可比性。在PAHs和OCPs提取的方法回收率和重现性等方面,三种方法之间没有显著差异。在程序空白以及检测限和定量限等方面,三种方法之间存在显著差异。总体而言,与MAE和索氏提取相比,ASE的提取效率最佳,并且MAE和索氏提取的提取效率根据所研究土壤的TOC含量等性质彼此相当。考虑到溶剂消耗和提取时间等其他因素,ASE和MAE比索氏提取更可取。