Suppr超能文献

索氏提取、微波辅助提取和加压液体萃取法揭示沉积物中低环多环芳烃的比较

Comparison of low-level polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in sediment revealed by Soxhlet extraction, microwave-assisted extraction, and pressurized liquid extraction.

作者信息

Itoh Nobuyasu, Numata Masahiko, Aoyagi Yoshie, Yarita Takashi

机构信息

National Metrology Institute of Japan, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, 1-1-1 Umezono, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8563, Japan.

出版信息

Anal Chim Acta. 2008 Mar 31;612(1):44-52. doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2008.02.012. Epub 2008 Feb 13.

Abstract

We analyzed polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) present in lake sediment at low levels (<1 microg g(-1)) by using Soxhlet extraction (Soxhlet), microwave-assisted extraction (MAE), and pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) in combination with gas chromatography and isotope-dilution mass spectrometry. Although all extraction techniques showed good repeatability for five target PAHs (relative standard deviation <5.2%, n=3), the results decreased in the order PLE>MAE>Soxhlet. Differences in the results originated mainly from differences in the extraction efficiencies of the techniques for native PAHs, because all techniques gave comparable recovery yields of corresponding 13C-labeled PAHs (13C-PAHs) (51-84%). Since non-negligible amounts of both native PAHs and 13C-PAHs were re-adsorbed on matrix in MAE, not only recovery yields of 13C-PAHs but also efficiencies of extraction of native PAHs should be examined to evaluate the appropriateness of any analytical procedures.

摘要

我们采用索氏提取法(Soxhlet)、微波辅助萃取法(MAE)和加压液体萃取法(PLE),结合气相色谱和同位素稀释质谱法,分析了湖泊沉积物中低含量(<1微克/克)的多环芳烃(PAHs)。尽管所有萃取技术对5种目标多环芳烃均显示出良好的重复性(相对标准偏差<5.2%,n = 3),但结果按PLE>MAE>Soxhlet的顺序递减。结果的差异主要源于这些技术对天然多环芳烃萃取效率的差异,因为所有技术对相应的13C标记多环芳烃(13C-PAHs)的回收率相当(51-84%)。由于在微波辅助萃取中,不可忽略量的天然多环芳烃和13C-PAHs都会重新吸附在基质上,因此为评估任何分析程序的适用性,不仅应检查13C-PAHs的回收率,还应检查天然多环芳烃的萃取效率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验