Boos Christopher J, Balakrishnan Balu, Lip Gregory Y H
Haemostasis, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology Unit, University Department of Medicine, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
Ann Med. 2008;40(1):66-73. doi: 10.1080/07853890701652833.
The quantification of circulating endothelial cells (CECs) in whole blood is an increasingly recognized index of endothelial damage/dysfunction. Abnormal CECs have been linked to the severity of coronary artery disease (CAD).
We assessed the relationship of CECs to other markers of endothelial dysfunction (von Willebrand factor (vWF) and soluble E-selectin (sEsel)) during exercise stress testing (EST) in a cohort of patients with suspected CAD.
We studied a cohort of patients referred to our chest pain clinic with a history of exertional chest pain. Treadmill EST was performed, using a full Bruce exercise protocol. Blood for CECs (immunobead method), vWF and sEsel (both ELISA) were collected immediately before (pre-exercise), immediately following exercise, and at 30 minutes post-EST.
We studied 31 patients (84% male; mean (SD) age 58.4 (9.8) years). Of the entire cohort, 14 patients (45.2%) had a positive EST. Exercise led to significant increases in levels of CECs, sEsel, vWF, white blood cells (WBC), heart rate, mean and systolic blood pressure compared with base-line (all P < 0.05). There was a significant correlation between the change (delta (immediate post-pre-exercise)) in CECs and delta vWF (r = 0.45; 95% CI 0.11-0.69: P = 0.01) and delta sEsel (r = 0.41; 0.05-0.7: P = 0.02), as well as between delta vWF and delta sEsel (r = 0.55; 0.25-0.76: P = 0.001). Neither absolute nor delta CEC counts were predictive of exercise work-load/functional capacity, nor the presence of positive EST results.
EST led to a significant increase in endothelial markers (CECs, vWF, and sEsel) compared with base-line levels. The rise in CECs correlated with the increases in other endothelial markers, but was not related to the either exercise workload/capacity or to the presence of a positive EST.
全血中循环内皮细胞(CECs)的定量分析是一种越来越被认可的内皮损伤/功能障碍指标。异常的CECs与冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的严重程度相关。
我们评估了在一组疑似CAD患者的运动应激试验(EST)期间,CECs与其他内皮功能障碍标志物(血管性血友病因子(vWF)和可溶性E选择素(sEsel))之间的关系。
我们研究了一组因劳力性胸痛病史而转诊至我们胸痛门诊的患者。使用完整的布鲁斯运动方案进行跑步机EST。在运动前(运动前)、运动后立即以及EST后30分钟采集用于检测CECs(免疫磁珠法)、vWF和sEsel(均采用ELISA法)的血液。
我们研究了31例患者(84%为男性;平均(标准差)年龄58.4(9.8)岁)。在整个队列中,14例患者(45.2%)EST结果为阳性。与基线相比,运动导致CECs、sEsel、vWF、白细胞(WBC)、心率、平均血压和收缩压水平显著升高(所有P<0.05)。CECs的变化(运动后即刻与运动前的差值(delta))与delta vWF(r = 0.45;95%CI 0.11 - 0.69:P = 0.01)和delta sEsel(r = 0.41;0.05 - 0.7:P = 0.02)之间存在显著相关性,以及delta vWF和delta sEsel之间(r = 0.55;0.25 - 0.76:P = 0.001)。绝对CECs计数和delta CECs计数均不能预测运动工作量/功能能力,也不能预测EST结果阳性的存在。
与基线水平相比,EST导致内皮标志物(CECs、vWF和sEsel)显著增加。CECs的升高与其他内皮标志物的增加相关,但与运动工作量/能力或EST结果阳性的存在均无关。