Wiedemann Peter M, Schütz Holger, Clauberg Martin
Research Centre Jülich, Institute of Neurosciences and Biophysics, Programme Group Humans, Environment, Technology, Jülich, Germany.
Bioelectromagnetics. 2008 Feb;29(2):133-44. doi: 10.1002/bem.20371.
This study investigated whether the SAR value is a purchase-relevant characteristic of mobile phones for laypersons and what effect the disclosure of a precautionary SAR value has on laypersons' risk perception. The study consisted of two parts: Study part 1 used a conjoint analysis design to explore the relevance of the SAR value and other features of mobile phones for an intended buying decision. Study part 2 used an experimental, repeated measures design to examine the effect of the magnitude of SAR values and the disclosure of a precautionary SAR value on risk perception. In addition, the study included an analysis of prior concerns of the study participants with regard to mobile phone risks. Part 1 indicates that the SAR value has a high relevance for laypersons' purchase intentions. In the experimental purchase setting it ranks even before price and equipment features. The results of study part 2 show that providing information of a precautionary limit value does not influence risk perception. This result suggests that laypersons' underlying subjective "safety model" for mobile phones resembles more a "margin of safety" concept than a threshold concept. The latter observation holds true no matter how concerned the participants are.
本研究调查了比吸收率(SAR)值是否是普通消费者购买手机时的一个与购买相关的特征,以及预防性比吸收率值的披露对普通消费者风险认知有何影响。该研究包括两个部分:研究部分1采用联合分析设计,以探究比吸收率值及手机其他特性对于购买决策意向的相关性。研究部分2采用实验性重复测量设计,以检验比吸收率值的大小及预防性比吸收率值的披露对风险认知的影响。此外,该研究还包括对研究参与者之前对手机风险的担忧的分析。研究部分1表明,比吸收率值与普通消费者的购买意愿高度相关。在实验性购买情境中,它甚至排在价格和设备特性之前。研究部分2的结果表明,提供预防性限值信息不会影响风险认知。这一结果表明,普通消费者对手机潜在的主观“安全模型”更类似于“安全边际”概念,而非阈值概念。无论参与者担忧程度如何,后一种观察结果都成立。