一项针对儿科实习主任满足医学教育联络委员会（LCME）关于医学生量化患者标准的ED-2要求的方法的全国性调查。

A national survey of pediatric clerkship directors' approaches to meeting the LCME ED-2 requirement for quantified patient criteria for medical students.

作者信息

Li Su-Ting T, Smith Sherilyn, Gigante Joseph

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of California Davis, Sacramento, California 95817, USA.

出版信息

Teach Learn Med. 2007 Fall;19(4):352-6. doi: 10.1080/10401330701542594.

DOI:10.1080/10401330701542594

PMID:17935464

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME) recently reinterpreted ED-2, their quantified patient criteria requirement.

PURPOSE

The purpose is to describe pediatric clerkship directors' response to ED-2.

METHOD

We used a survey of U.S. and Canadian pediatric clerkship directors.

RESULTS

Survey response rate was 76% (108/142). The most frequent categories that clerkship directors used to describe quantified patient criteria were age group (77%), organ systems (65%), or symptoms (61%). Computer simulations were the alternative patient experience in 83% of clerkships. Patient logs (90%) and checklists (31%) tracked student completion of ED-2. Thirty-two respondents had an LCME visit since ED-2 was reinterpreted, and 69% reported that LCME had concerns about their clerkships' fulfillment of ED-2. There was no difference in method of ED-2 implementation between schools who were cited by LCME and those who were not.

CONCLUSIONS

Clerkship directors have used a variety of approaches to specify and monitor quantified patient criteria.

摘要

背景

医学教育联络委员会（LCME）最近重新解释了其量化患者标准要求ED-2。

目的

目的是描述儿科实习主任对ED-2的反应。

方法

我们对美国和加拿大的儿科实习主任进行了一项调查。

结果

调查回复率为76%（108/142）。实习主任用于描述量化患者标准的最常见类别是年龄组（77%）、器官系统（65%）或症状（61%）。在83%的实习中，计算机模拟是替代患者体验。患者日志（90%）和检查表（31%）跟踪学生对ED-2的完成情况。自ED-2被重新解释以来，32名受访者接受了LCME访问，69%的人报告称LCME对他们实习中ED-2的完成情况表示担忧。被LCME引用的学校和未被引用的学校在ED-2实施方法上没有差异。