Tonner Ralf, Heydenrych Greta, Frenking Gernot
Fachbereich Chemie, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Hans-Meerwein-Strasse, D-35032 Marburg, Germany.
Chem Asian J. 2007 Dec 3;2(12):1555-67. doi: 10.1002/asia.200700235.
DFT calculations at the BP86/TZ2P level were carried out to analyze quantitatively the metal-ligand bonding in transition-metal complexes that contain imidazole (IMID), imidazol-2-ylidene (nNHC), or imidazol-4-ylidene (aNHC). The calculated complexes are [Cl4TM(L)] (TM = Ti, Zr, Hf), [(CO)5TM(L)] (TM = Cr, Mo, W), [(CO)4TM(L)] (TM = Fe, Ru, Os), and [ClTM(L)] (TM = Cu, Ag, Au). The relative energies of the free ligands increase in the order IMID < nNHC < aNHC. The energy levels of the carbon sigma lone-pair orbitals suggest the trend aNHC > nNHC > IMID for the donor strength, which is in agreement with the progression of the metal-ligand bond-dissociation energy (BDE) for the three ligands for all metals of Groups 4, 6, 8, and 10. The electrostatic attraction can also be decisive in determining trends in ligand-metal bond strength. The comparison of the results of energy decomposition analysis for the Group 6 complexes [(CO)5TM(L)] (L = nNHC, aNHC, IMID) with phosphine complexes (L = PMe3 and PCl3) shows that the phosphine ligands are weaker sigma donors and better pi acceptors than the NHC tautomers nNHC, aNHC, and IMID.
在BP86/TZ2P水平上进行了密度泛函理论(DFT)计算,以定量分析含有咪唑(IMID)、咪唑-2-亚基(nNHC)或咪唑-4-亚基(aNHC)的过渡金属配合物中的金属-配体键。计算的配合物为[Cl4TM(L)](TM = Ti、Zr、Hf)、[(CO)5TM(L)](TM = Cr、Mo、W)、[(CO)4TM(L)](TM = Fe、Ru、Os)和[ClTM(L)](TM = Cu、Ag、Au)。游离配体的相对能量按IMID < nNHC < aNHC的顺序增加。碳σ孤对轨道的能级表明供体强度的趋势为aNHC > nNHC > IMID,这与第4、6、8和10族所有金属的三种配体的金属-配体键解离能(BDE)的变化一致。静电引力在决定配体-金属键强度趋势方面也可能起决定性作用。对第6族配合物[(CO)5TM(L)](L = nNHC、aNHC、IMID)与膦配合物(L = PMe3和PCl3)的能量分解分析结果的比较表明,膦配体作为σ供体比NHC互变异构体nNHC、aNHC和IMID弱,而作为π受体则更好。