Shuai Lan, Wang Yu-feng
Institute of Mental Health, Peking University, Beijing 100083, China.
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2007 Oct 18;39(5):526-30.
To study the executive function (EF) characteristics in boys with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) comorbid learning disabilities (LD).
A total of 22 pure ADHD boys, 22 ADHD+LD boys and 22 normal controls (by criteria of DSM-IV) were collected as our samples. The groups were matched by ages (less than 6 months) and ADHD subtypes. The research instruments included the Stroop color-word task, Rey complex figure test, digit span test, trail making test, tower of Hanoi and verbal fluency test.
The differences of VIQ weren't significant among the three groups; pure ADHD and ADHD+LD groups had lower PIQ than the control group; ADHD+LD boys had lower IQ than the controls. The performance in the EF tests: (1) Both pure ADHD and ADHD+LD groups performed worse in the aspects of time of number-letter part and shifting time, the repeat response of verbal fluency, and the differences were significant. But the differences between ADHD and ADHD+LD weren't significant. (2) ADHD+LD group also showed deficits in the aspects of time and errors of Stroops 2 and 4, time of Stroop 4, word interference time, the immediate memory and delayed recalling detail score of Rey complex figure test, time of number trail making, error steps (rule violation) of Tow of Hanoi, and the differences were significant. (3) Both ADHD+LD and pure ADHD groups made more errors in the naming color of the color-word card (Stroop part 4), and ADHD+LD boys performed worse than pure ADHD boys.
The findings support the hypothesis that ADHD is related to EF deficit, whether or not comorbid LD. ADHD+LD showed significant difference in the aspects of inhibition, working memory, set shifting and fluency as compared with normal group, ADHD+LD boys perform more poorly than the pure ADHD boys. It's plausible that both ADHD and LD are associated with deficits of executive function.
研究注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)合并学习障碍(LD)男孩的执行功能(EF)特征。
共收集22名单纯ADHD男孩、22名ADHD + LD男孩和22名正常对照(按DSM - IV标准)作为样本。各组按年龄(相差小于6个月)和ADHD亚型进行匹配。研究工具包括Stroop色词任务、雷氏复杂图形测验、数字广度测验、连线测验、河内塔测验和言语流畅性测验。
三组间智商(VIQ)差异不显著;单纯ADHD组和ADHD + LD组的操作智商(PIQ)低于对照组;ADHD + LD男孩的智商低于对照组。执行功能测试表现:(1)单纯ADHD组和ADHD + LD组在数字 - 字母部分时间和转换时间、言语流畅性的重复反应方面表现较差,差异有统计学意义。但ADHD组与ADHD + LD组之间差异不显著。(2)ADHD + LD组在Stroop 2和4的时间和错误、Stroop 4时间、单词干扰时间、雷氏复杂图形测验的即时记忆和延迟回忆细节得分、数字连线时间、河内塔错误步骤(违反规则)方面也存在缺陷,差异有统计学意义。(3)ADHD + LD组和单纯ADHD组在色词卡片颜色命名(Stroop部分4)中错误更多,且ADHD + LD男孩比单纯ADHD男孩表现更差。
研究结果支持以下假设,即无论是否合并LD,ADHD均与执行功能缺陷有关。与正常组相比,ADHD + LD在抑制、工作记忆、定势转换和流畅性方面存在显著差异,ADHD + LD男孩比单纯ADHD男孩表现更差。ADHD和LD都与执行功能缺陷有关这一观点似乎合理。