Shuai Lan, Wang Yu-feng
Institute of Mental Health, Peking University, Beijing 100083, China.
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2007 Jun 18;39(3):241-6.
To answer the question whether executive function (EF) deficits are specific to attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) or whether such deficits are also associated with disruptive behavior disorders (DBD), including oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) and conductive disorder (CD).
A total of 19 pure ADHD boys, 19 ADHD+DBD boys and 19 normal controls (criteria of DSM-IV) were collected as our samples. The groups were matched by age (less than 6 months). The research instruments included Stroop color-word task, Rey complex figure test, digit span test, trail making test, tower of Hanoi and verbal fluency test.
The differences of IQs weren't significant among three groups. (1) Both pure ADHD group and ADHD+DBD group performed worse (P<0.05) in the aspects of the time of Stroops 2 and 4, errors of Stroop 4; the delay recalling structure and detail score, the immediate memory detail score of Rey complex figure test; error steps (rule violation) of tow of Hanoi. But the differences between pure ADHD and ADHD+DBD weren't significant (P>0.05). (2) pure ADHD group also showed deficits in the aspects of errors of Stroop 2, time and errors of Stroop 3, word interference time; immediate memory structure score of Rey complex figure test; time and errors of number letter part and shifting time of trail making test; total time and steps of completing tower of Hanoi. The differences were significant (P<0.05). (3) ADHD+DBD group performed better on the time of naming color of the color block card (part 2,P=0.044) and color-word card (part 4,P=0.022), and also had the tendency to shorter word interference time (P=0.055) than pure ADHD group.
The findings support the hypothesis that ADHD is related to EF deficit, whether or not comorbid DBD. ADHD+DBD group showed significant difference in the aspects of inhibition and working memory as compared with the normal group, but the area and degree of EF deficits were less than pure ADHD group.
回答以下问题,即执行功能(EF)缺陷是否为注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)所特有,或者这些缺陷是否也与破坏性行为障碍(DBD)相关,包括对立违抗性障碍(ODD)和品行障碍(CD)。
共收集19名单纯ADHD男孩、19名ADHD + DBD男孩和19名正常对照(符合DSM - IV标准)作为样本。各组按年龄匹配(相差小于6个月)。研究工具包括Stroop色词任务、雷氏复杂图形测验、数字广度测验、连线测验、河内塔测验和言语流畅性测验。
三组间智商差异不显著。(1)单纯ADHD组和ADHD + DBD组在Stroop 2和4的时间、Stroop 4的错误、雷氏复杂图形测验的延迟回忆结构和细节得分、即时记忆细节得分、河内塔的错误步骤(违反规则)等方面表现更差(P < 0.05)。但单纯ADHD组与ADHD + DBD组之间差异不显著(P > 0.05)。(2)单纯ADHD组在Stroop 2的错误、Stroop 3的时间和错误、单词干扰时间、雷氏复杂图形测验的即时记忆结构得分、数字字母部分的时间和错误以及连线测验的转换时间、完成河内塔的总时间和步骤等方面也表现出缺陷。差异显著(P < 0.05)。(3)ADHD + DBD组在色块卡片颜色命名时间(第2部分,P = 0.044)和色词卡片颜色命名时间(第4部分,P = 0.022)方面表现更好,并且与单纯ADHD组相比,单词干扰时间也有缩短趋势(P = 0.055)。
研究结果支持以下假设,即无论是否合并DBD,ADHD均与EF缺陷有关。ADHD + DBD组与正常组相比,在抑制和工作记忆方面存在显著差异,但EF缺陷的范围和程度小于单纯ADHD组。