文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

作者信息

von Elm Erik, Altman Douglas G, Egger Matthias, Pocock Stuart J, Gøtzsche Peter C, Vandenbroucke Jan P

机构信息

Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

PLoS Med. 2007 Oct 16;4(10):e296. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040296.


DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040296
PMID:17941714
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2020495/
Abstract

Much biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalisability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cover three main study designs: cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies. We convened a 2-day workshop in September 2004, with methodologists, researchers, and journal editors to draft a checklist of items. This list was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group and in e-mail discussions with the larger group of STROBE contributors, taking into account empirical evidence and methodological considerations. The workshop and the subsequent iterative process of consultation and revision resulted in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE Statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles. 18 items are common to all three study designs and four are specific for cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies. A detailed Explanation and Elaboration document is published separately and is freely available on the Web sites of PLoS Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine, and Epidemiology. We hope that the STROBE Statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of observational studies.

摘要

相似文献

[1]
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

PLoS Med. 2007-10-16

[2]
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

Lancet. 2007-10-20

[3]
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

Epidemiology. 2007-11

[4]
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

Ann Intern Med. 2007-10-16

[5]
[The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting of observational studies].

Internist (Berl). 2008-6

[6]
[The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies].

Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2008

[7]
[The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology [STROBE] statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies].

Gac Sanit. 2008

[8]
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

Bull World Health Organ. 2007-11

[9]
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

Int J Surg. 2014-7-18

[10]
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2008-4

引用本文的文献

[1]
Planetary Health Diet and risk of mortality and chronic diseases: Results from US NHANES, UK Biobank, and a meta-analysis.

Sci Adv. 2025-9-5

[2]
Evaluation of a 12-week Mediterranean diet-based nutritional and educational programme for breast cancer survivors: impact on BMI, fatigue, dietary adherence, and menopausal symptoms.

Front Nutr. 2025-8-18

[3]
Impact of mild cortisol excess on osteoporosis and the mediating role of sarcopenia-related traits: A Mendelian randomization study.

Medicine (Baltimore). 2025-8-29

[4]
Long-term impact of central venous catheters in pediatric cancer survivors.

Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2025-7-24

[5]
Expanding the boundaries of minimally invasive surgery: the feasibility of robotic natural orifice transluminal extraction colectomy and robotic no-incision colectomy in colorectal practice.

Ann Coloproctol. 2025-8

[6]
Injury severity-based discrepancies in severe trauma survival improvement.

Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025-8-28

[7]
High retention rates of custom 3D printed titanium implants in complex pelvic reconstruction, a report on 106 consecutive cases over 10 years.

Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025-8-28

[8]
Nutritional Status and Feeding Difficulty of Older People Residing in Nursing Homes: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study.

Nutrients. 2025-8-11

[9]
Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms for Fitness-Based Cardiometabolic Risk Classification in Adolescents.

Sports (Basel). 2025-8-18

[10]
Sense of Coherence and Perceived Academic Stress Among Nursing Students: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study.

Nurs Rep. 2025-8-8

本文引用的文献

[1]
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration.

Epidemiology. 2007-11

[2]
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration.

PLoS Med. 2007-10-16

[3]
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration.

Ann Intern Med. 2007-10-16

[4]
Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography.

Int J Epidemiol. 2007-6

[5]
Bias in psychiatric case-control studies: literature survey.

Br J Psychiatry. 2007-3

[6]
Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review.

Med J Aust. 2006-9-4

[7]
Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement.

JAMA. 2006-3-8

[8]
Reporting randomized, controlled trials of herbal interventions: an elaborated CONSORT statement.

Ann Intern Med. 2006-3-7

[9]
Comparison of evidence on harms of medical interventions in randomized and nonrandomized studies.

CMAJ. 2006-2-28

[10]
A road map for efficient and reliable human genome epidemiology.

Nat Genet. 2006-1

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索