Suppr超能文献

《加强流行病学观察性研究报告(STROBE)声明》:观察性研究报告指南

The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.

作者信息

von Elm Erik, Altman Douglas G, Egger Matthias, Pocock Stuart J, Gøtzsche Peter C, Vandenbroucke Jan P

机构信息

Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine (ISPM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

PLoS Med. 2007 Oct 16;4(10):e296. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040296.

Abstract

Much biomedical research is observational. The reporting of such research is often inadequate, which hampers the assessment of its strengths and weaknesses and of a study's generalisability. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Initiative developed recommendations on what should be included in an accurate and complete report of an observational study. We defined the scope of the recommendations to cover three main study designs: cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional studies. We convened a 2-day workshop in September 2004, with methodologists, researchers, and journal editors to draft a checklist of items. This list was subsequently revised during several meetings of the coordinating group and in e-mail discussions with the larger group of STROBE contributors, taking into account empirical evidence and methodological considerations. The workshop and the subsequent iterative process of consultation and revision resulted in a checklist of 22 items (the STROBE Statement) that relate to the title, abstract, introduction, methods, results, and discussion sections of articles. 18 items are common to all three study designs and four are specific for cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional studies. A detailed Explanation and Elaboration document is published separately and is freely available on the Web sites of PLoS Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine, and Epidemiology. We hope that the STROBE Statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of observational studies.

摘要

许多生物医学研究都是观察性的。此类研究的报告往往不够充分,这妨碍了对其优缺点及研究可推广性的评估。加强流行病学观察性研究报告(STROBE)倡议制定了关于观察性研究准确完整报告应包含内容的建议。我们将建议范围界定为涵盖三种主要研究设计:队列研究、病例对照研究和横断面研究。2004年9月,我们召集了一次为期两天的研讨会,参会人员有方法学家、研究人员和期刊编辑,以起草一份条目清单。随后,在协调小组的几次会议以及与更多STROBE贡献者的电子邮件讨论中,考虑到实证证据和方法学考量,对这份清单进行了修订。此次研讨会以及随后反复的咨询和修订过程产生了一份包含22项条目的清单(STROBE声明),这些条目与文章的标题、摘要、引言、方法、结果和讨论部分相关。其中18项条目是三种研究设计共有的,4项是队列研究、病例对照研究或横断面研究特有的。一份详细的解释与阐述文件已单独发表,可在《公共科学图书馆·医学》、《内科学年鉴》和《流行病学》的网站上免费获取。我们希望STROBE声明将有助于提高观察性研究报告的质量。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

4
Long-term impact of central venous catheters in pediatric cancer survivors.
Res Pract Thromb Haemost. 2025 Jul 24;9(5):102986. doi: 10.1016/j.rpth.2025.102986. eCollection 2025 Jul.
6
Injury severity-based discrepancies in severe trauma survival improvement.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025 Aug 28;51(1):280. doi: 10.1007/s00068-025-02946-z.

本文引用的文献

1
3
Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration.
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Oct 16;147(8):W163-94. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010-w1.
5
Bias in psychiatric case-control studies: literature survey.
Br J Psychiatry. 2007 Mar;190:204-9. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.106.027250.
6
Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review.
Med J Aust. 2006 Sep 4;185(5):263-7. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00557.x.
8
Reporting randomized, controlled trials of herbal interventions: an elaborated CONSORT statement.
Ann Intern Med. 2006 Mar 7;144(5):364-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-144-5-200603070-00013.
10
A road map for efficient and reliable human genome epidemiology.
Nat Genet. 2006 Jan;38(1):3-5. doi: 10.1038/ng0106-3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验