Eggert Thilo, Palisaar Jüri, Metz Petra, Noldus Joachim
Department of Urology, Marienhospital Herne, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Germany.
BJU Int. 2007 Dec;100(6):1268-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2007.07221.x. Epub 2007 Oct 17.
To determine if transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS) is as reliable as cystography in detecting vesico-urethral extravasation (VE) after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP).
Between October 2005 and February 2006 we prospectively investigated 100 consecutive patients undergoing RRP. The vesico-urethral anastomosis was assessed 6 days after RRP by a combined investigation with TRUS and cystography.
In most patients (79%), at 6 days after RRP the vesico-urethral anastomosis was watertight or showed minimal leakage (8%), so that the urinary catheter was removed. Different degrees of VE were detected in 21 patients. Because of small, moderate or marked VE, the indwelling catheter remained until 9, 14 and 21 days after RRP in five, three and five patients, respectively. Every VE documented by cystography was detected by TRUS beforehand; therefore TRUS showed no false-negative results in detecting a leaking anastomosis. In two patients paraurethral fluid was detected by TRUS mimicking VE, with no confirmation by cystography.
TRUS can safely replace cystography for detecting anastomotic leakage after RRP. The decision to remove the catheter after RRP can be made without radiation exposure and use of expensive contrast medium.
确定经直肠超声检查(TRUS)在检测耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术(RRP)后膀胱尿道外渗(VE)方面是否与膀胱造影一样可靠。
2005年10月至2006年2月期间,我们对100例连续接受RRP的患者进行了前瞻性研究。RRP术后6天,通过TRUS和膀胱造影联合检查评估膀胱尿道吻合情况。
大多数患者(79%)在RRP术后6天膀胱尿道吻合口无渗漏或仅有轻微渗漏(8%),因此拔除了导尿管。21例患者检测到不同程度的VE。由于轻度、中度或重度VE,分别有5例、3例和5例患者的留置导尿管在RRP术后9天、14天和21天仍未拔除。膀胱造影记录的每一例VE事先均被TRUS检测到;因此,TRUS在检测吻合口漏方面无假阴性结果。2例患者TRUS检测到尿道旁液体,疑似VE,但膀胱造影未证实。
TRUS可安全替代膀胱造影用于检测RRP术后吻合口漏。RRP术后拔除导尿管的决定可在无辐射暴露且不使用昂贵造影剂的情况下做出。