Suppr超能文献

即使对于高危患者,采用二氧化碳气腹的腹腔镜胆囊切除术也是安全的。

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with carbon dioxide pneumoperitoneum is safe even for high-risk patients.

作者信息

Koivusalo A-M, Pere P, Valjus M, Scheinin T

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Helsinki University, Kasarmikatu 11-13, 00100, Helsinki, Finland.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2008 Jan;22(1):61-7. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9300-2. Epub 2007 Oct 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Because of absorbed carbon dioxide (CO(2)) and elevated intraabdominal pressure (IAP), CO(2) pneumoperitoneum (CO(2)PP) has potentially harmful intraoperative circulatory and ventilatory effects. Although not clinically significant for healthy patients, these effects are assumed to be deleterious for patients with a high risk for anesthesia (American Society of Anesthesiology [ASA] 3 and 4) and significant cardiopulmonary, renal, or hepatic diseases. The authors assessed CO(2)PP-related adverse effects by comparing ASA 3 and 4 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with or without CO(2)PP.

METHODS

A total of 20 successive ASA 3 and 4 patients who underwent LC were randomized into CO(2)PP (n = 10) and abdominal wall elevator (Laparolift) (n = 10) groups. The parameters for perioperative hemodynamics, ventilation, perfusion of intraabdominal organs, and blood chemistry were recorded periodically from before the induction of the anesthesia until postoperative day 2 and compared between the groups.

RESULTS

Mean age, height, weight, the proportional number of ASA 3 vs ASA 4 patients, the volume of perioperative fluid loading, and the dose of analgesics did not differ significantly between the groups. The length of the operation was 49.9 +/- 10.6 min for the CO(2)PP group and 50.6 +/- 17.2 min for Laparolift group (nonsignificant difference). The mean central venous pressure (CVP) 30 min after insufflation was higher (12.3 +/- 4.8 vs 7.9 +/- 3.7 mmHg) and the (Gastric Mucosal pH) pHi at the end of the operation was lower (7.29 +/- 0.07 vs 7.35 +/- 0.04) in the CO(2)PP group than in the Laparolift group (p < 0.05). Later, CVP and pHi did not differ significantly. Other parameters of hemodynamics including oxygenation, perfusion, and blood chemistry did not differ significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

For LC for patients with an ASA 3 and 4 risk for anesthesia, no significant adverse effects could be attributed to CO(2 )pneumoperitoneum. For high-risk patients, preoperative preparation and active perioperative monitoring are essential for safe anesthesia for LC with or without CO(2)PP.

摘要

背景

由于二氧化碳(CO₂)吸收和腹内压(IAP)升高,二氧化碳气腹(CO₂PP)具有潜在有害的术中循环和通气影响。尽管对健康患者而言这些影响在临床上并不显著,但对于麻醉高风险患者(美国麻醉医师协会[ASA] 3级和4级)以及患有严重心肺、肾脏或肝脏疾病的患者,这些影响被认为是有害的。作者通过比较接受或未接受CO₂PP的腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的ASA 3级和4级患者,评估了与CO₂PP相关的不良反应。

方法

总共20例连续接受LC的ASA 3级和4级患者被随机分为CO₂PP组(n = 10)和腹壁提升器(Laparolift)组(n = 10)。从麻醉诱导前直至术后第2天定期记录围手术期血流动力学、通气、腹内器官灌注和血液化学参数,并在两组之间进行比较。

结果

两组患者的平均年龄、身高、体重、ASA 3级与ASA 4级患者的比例数、围手术期液体输入量以及镇痛药剂量无显著差异。CO₂PP组手术时长为49.9±10.6分钟,Laparolift组为50.6±17.2分钟(无显著差异)。CO₂PP组充气后30分钟的平均中心静脉压(CVP)较高(12.3±4.8对7.9±3.7 mmHg),且手术结束时的胃黏膜pH值(pHi)较低(7.29±0.07对7.35±0.04),均低于Laparolift组(p < 0.05)。之后,CVP和pHi无显著差异。包括氧合、灌注和血液化学在内的其他血流动力学参数无显著差异。

结论

对于具有ASA 3级和4级麻醉风险的患者行LC,二氧化碳气腹未产生显著不良反应。对于高风险患者,无论是否采用CO₂PP进行LC,术前准备和积极的围手术期监测对于安全麻醉至关重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验