Lafuente-Lafuente C, Mouly S, Longas-Tejero M A, Bergmann J F
Hôpital Lariboisière, Service de Médecine Interne A, 2, rue ambroise Paré, Paris, France, 75010.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Oct 17(4):CD005049. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005049.pub2.
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most frequent sustained arrhythmia. After restoration of normal sinus rhythm, the recurrence rate of AF is high. Antiarrhythmic drugs have been widely used to prevent recurrence, but the effect of these drugs on mortality and other clinical outcomes is unclear.
To determine, in patients who recovered sinus rhythm after AF, the effect of long-term treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs on death, stroke and embolism, adverse effects, pro-arrhythmia and recurrence of AF. If several antiarrhythmics were effective our secondary aim was to compare them.
The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) on The Cochrane Libary (Issue 2, 2005), MEDLINE (1950 to May 2005) and EMBASE (1966 to May 2005) were searched. The reference lists of retrieved articles, recent reviews and meta-analyses were checked. No language restrictions were applied.
Two independent reviewers selected randomised controlled trials comparing any antiarrhythmic with a control (no treatment, placebo or drugs for rate control) or with another antiarrhythmic, in adults who had AF and in whom sinus rhythm was restored. Post-operative AF was excluded.
Two reviewers independently assessed quality and extracted data, on an intention-to-treat basis. Disagreements were resolved by discussion. Studies were pooled, if appropriate, using Peto odds ratio (OR).
45 studies met inclusion criteria, comprising 12,559 patients. All results were calculated at 1 year of follow-up. Class IA drugs (disopyramide, quinidine) were associated with increased mortality compared with controls (OR 2.39, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03 to 5.59, P = 0.04, number needed to harm (NNH) 109, 95% CI 34 to 4985). Other antiarrhythmics did not modify mortality. Several class IA (disopyramide, quinidine), IC (flecainide, propafenone) and III (amiodarone, dofetilide, dronedarone, sotalol) drugs significantly reduced recurrence of AF (OR 0.19 to 0.60, number needed to treat 2 to 9), but all increased withdrawals due to adverse affects (NNH 17 to 36) and all but amiodarone and propafenone increased pro-arrhythmia (NNH 17 to 119).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Several class IA, IC and III drugs are effective in maintaining sinus rhythm but increase adverse events, including pro-arrhythmia, and disopyramide and quinidine are associated with increased mortality. Any benefit on clinically relevant outcomes (embolisms, heart failure, mortality) remains to be established.
心房颤动(房颤)是最常见的持续性心律失常。恢复正常窦性心律后,房颤的复发率很高。抗心律失常药物已被广泛用于预防复发,但这些药物对死亡率和其他临床结局的影响尚不清楚。
确定房颤后恢复窦性心律的患者中,抗心律失常药物长期治疗对死亡、中风和栓塞、不良反应、促心律失常及房颤复发的影响。如果几种抗心律失常药物有效,我们的次要目标是比较它们。
检索了《 Cochr ane图书馆》(2005年第2期)中的Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)、MEDLINE(1950年至2005年5月)和EMBASE(1966年至2005年5月)。检查了检索到的文章、近期综述和荟萃分析的参考文献列表。未设语言限制。
两名独立的审阅者选择了随机对照试验,这些试验比较了任何抗心律失常药物与对照组(无治疗、安慰剂或用于控制心率的药物)或与另一种抗心律失常药物,受试对象为患有房颤且已恢复窦性心律的成年人。排除术后房颤。
两名审阅者在意向性分析的基础上独立评估质量并提取数据。分歧通过讨论解决。如果合适,使用Peto比值比(OR)对研究进行汇总。
45项研究符合纳入标准,共12559例患者。所有结果均在随访1年时计算得出。与对照组相比,IA类药物(双异丙吡胺、奎尼丁)与死亡率增加相关(OR 2.39,95%置信区间(CI)1.03至5.59,P = 0.04,伤害所需人数(NNH)109,95%CI 34至4985)。其他抗心律失常药物未改变死亡率。几种IA类(双异丙吡胺、奎尼丁)、IC类(氟卡尼、普罗帕酮)和III类(胺碘酮、多非利特、决奈达隆、索他洛尔)药物显著降低了房颤的复发率(OR 0.19至0.60,治疗所需人数2至9),但均因不良反应增加了退出研究的人数(NNH 17至36),除胺碘酮和普罗帕酮外,均增加了促心律失常的发生率(NNH 17至119)。
几种IA类、IC类和III类药物在维持窦性心律方面有效,但会增加不良事件,包括促心律失常,双异丙吡胺和奎尼丁与死亡率增加相关。对临床相关结局(栓塞、心力衰竭、死亡率)的任何益处仍有待确定。