Falk-Brynhildsen K, Söderquist B, Friberg O, Nilsson U
Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro, Sweden,
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014 Nov;33(11):1981-7. doi: 10.1007/s10096-014-2168-x. Epub 2014 Jun 8.
The aim of the present study was to compare microbial skin sealant versus bare skin on the leg regarding intraoperative bacterial presence in the surgical wound and time to recolonization of the adjacent skin at the saphenous vein harvesting site. A second aim was to evaluate the incidence of leg wound infection 2 months after surgery. In this randomized controlled trial, 140 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) between May 2010 and October 2011 were enrolled. Bacterial samples were taken preoperatively and intraoperatively at multiple time points and locations. OF the patients, 125 (92.6 %) were followed up 2 months postoperatively regarding wound infection. Intraoperative bacterial growth did not differ between the bare skin (n = 68) and the microbial skin sealant group (n = 67) at any time point. At 2 months postoperatively, 7/61 patients (11.5 %) in the skin sealant versus 14/64 (21.9 %) in the bare skin group (p = 0.120) had been treated with antibiotics for a verified or suspected surgical site infection (SSI) at the harvest site. We found almost no intraoperative bacterial presence on the skin or in the subcutaneous tissue, irrespective of microbial skin sealant use. In contrast, we observed a relatively high incidence of late wound infection, indicating that wound contamination occurred postoperatively. Further research is necessary to determine whether the use of microbial skin sealant reduces the incidence of leg wound infection at the saphenous vein harvest site.
本研究的目的是比较腿部使用微生物皮肤密封剂与裸露皮肤在手术伤口术中细菌存在情况以及大隐静脉采集部位相邻皮肤重新定植时间方面的差异。第二个目的是评估术后2个月腿部伤口感染的发生率。在这项随机对照试验中,纳入了2010年5月至2011年10月期间接受冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的140例患者。在术前和术中的多个时间点和位置采集细菌样本。125例(92.6%)患者术后2个月接受了伤口感染随访。在任何时间点,裸露皮肤组(n = 68)和微生物皮肤密封剂组(n = 67)术中细菌生长情况均无差异。术后2个月,皮肤密封剂组61例患者中有7例(11.5%),而裸露皮肤组64例中有14例(21.9%)因采集部位已证实或疑似手术部位感染(SSI)接受了抗生素治疗(p = 0.120)。无论是否使用微生物皮肤密封剂,我们发现皮肤或皮下组织中几乎没有术中细菌存在。相比之下,我们观察到晚期伤口感染发生率相对较高,这表明伤口污染发生在术后。有必要进行进一步研究以确定使用微生物皮肤密封剂是否能降低大隐静脉采集部位腿部伤口感染的发生率。