Leffler D A, Edwards George J B, Dennis M, Cook E F, Schuppan D, Kelly C P
The Celiac Center, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Boston, MA 02215, USA.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Nov 1;26(9):1227-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03501.x.
Increasing numbers of individuals are now being diagnosed with coeliac disease. The only accepted treatment for coeliac disease is lifelong adherence to a strict gluten-free diet (GFD). Individuals' ability to adhere to the GFD varies, but systematic studies guiding the assessment of adherence are currently lacking.
We sought to compare the predictive value of self-report and four serologic tests compared to expert nutritionist evaluation.
In all, 154 individual adults with biopsy-proven coeliac disease rated their adherence to the GFD on a Likert scale. Serum antibody titres of IgA anti-tissue transglutaminase, and IgA and IgG anti-deamidated gliadin peptides were determined. Using anova and ROC analyses, results were compared to a standardized evaluation by an expert nutritionist blinded to the participants' self-rated adherence and serology results.
All serologic measures as well as participant reported adherence were significantly associated with GFD adherence as assessed by expert nutritionist evaluation. However, on ROC analysis no measure performed satisfactorily. The performance of serologic testing, but not self-report, improved with increased time on the GFD.
Although current serologic tests have very high sensitivities and specificities for the diagnosis of coeliac disease, they cannot replace trained nutritionist evaluation in the assessment of GFD adherence.
现在被诊断为乳糜泻的个体数量在增加。乳糜泻唯一被认可的治疗方法是终身严格坚持无麸质饮食(GFD)。个体坚持GFD的能力各不相同,但目前缺乏指导依从性评估的系统性研究。
我们试图比较自我报告和四项血清学检测与专家营养师评估相比的预测价值。
总共154名经活检证实患有乳糜泻的成年个体用李克特量表对他们坚持GFD的情况进行评分。测定血清中抗组织转谷氨酰胺酶IgA以及抗去酰胺麦醇溶蛋白多肽IgA和IgG的抗体滴度。使用方差分析和ROC分析,将结果与一位对参与者的自我评分依从性和血清学结果不知情的专家营养师的标准化评估进行比较。
所有血清学指标以及参与者报告的依从性与专家营养师评估的GFD依从性均显著相关。然而,在ROC分析中,没有一项指标表现令人满意。血清学检测的表现(而非自我报告)随着坚持GFD时间的增加而改善。
尽管目前的血清学检测对乳糜泻的诊断具有非常高的敏感性和特异性,但在评估GFD依从性方面,它们无法取代训练有素的营养师评估。