• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

地方和国家评估者的交汇之处:对伦理评估实践的意外威胁。

Where local and national evaluators meet: unintended threats to ethical evaluation practice.

作者信息

Rodi Michael S, Paget Kathleen D

机构信息

University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.

出版信息

Eval Program Plann. 2007 Nov;30(4):416-21. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2007.06.005. Epub 2007 Jul 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2007.06.005
PMID:17945142
Abstract

The ethical work of program evaluators is based on a covenant of honesty and transparency among stakeholders. Yet even under the most favorable evaluation conditions, threats to ethical standards exist and muddle that covenant. Unfortunately, ethical issues associated with different evaluation structures and contracting arrangements have received little attention in the evaluation research literature. This article focuses on the unintended ethical threats associated with multitiered evaluation contexts. After briefly reviewing the various frames through which evaluation theory and ethics are commonly viewed, we discuss ethical challenges associated with multitiered evaluation designs including examples drawn from our evaluation projects. The article concludes with specific findings and recommendations for evaluators, grantors, grantees, and researchers.

摘要

项目评估者的伦理工作基于利益相关者之间诚实与透明的契约。然而,即使在最有利的评估条件下,伦理标准仍面临威胁并使该契约变得模糊不清。不幸的是,与不同评估结构和合同安排相关的伦理问题在评估研究文献中很少受到关注。本文聚焦于与多层评估背景相关的意外伦理威胁。在简要回顾评估理论和伦理通常被看待的各种框架之后,我们讨论与多层评估设计相关的伦理挑战,包括从我们的评估项目中选取的实例。文章最后给出了针对评估者、资助者、受资助者和研究者的具体研究结果及建议。

相似文献

1
Where local and national evaluators meet: unintended threats to ethical evaluation practice.地方和国家评估者的交汇之处:对伦理评估实践的意外威胁。
Eval Program Plann. 2007 Nov;30(4):416-21. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2007.06.005. Epub 2007 Jul 6.
2
Foundation officers, evaluation, and ethical problems: a pilot investigation.基金会工作人员、评估与伦理问题:一项试点调查
Eval Program Plann. 2007 Nov;30(4):410-5. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2007.06.003. Epub 2007 Jul 3.
3
The priority of justice: a framework approach to ethics in program evaluation.正义的优先性:项目评估伦理的框架方法
Eval Program Plann. 2007 Nov;30(4):394-9. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2007.06.007. Epub 2007 Jul 10.
4
Expanding the conversation on evaluation ethics.
Eval Program Plann. 2007 Nov;30(4):400-3. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2007.06.002. Epub 2007 Jul 3.
5
Using theories of action to guide national program evaluation and local strategy in the community care network demonstration.运用行动理论指导社区护理网络示范项目中的国家项目评估和地方策略。
Med Care Res Rev. 2003 Dec;60(4 Suppl):17S-39S. doi: 10.1177/1077558703259072.
6
Evaluating federally-funded child welfare training partnerships: a worthwhile challenge.评估联邦资助的儿童福利培训伙伴关系:一项值得应对的挑战。
J Health Soc Policy. 2002;15(3-4):189-201. doi: 10.1300/J045v15n03_13.
7
Big bang theory: more reason to scrap Bush's stem cell policy.大爆炸理论:摒弃布什干细胞政策的更多理由。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2008 Nov-Dec;38(6):5-6; author reply 6.
8
Trustworthiness in evaluation practice: an emphasis on the relational.评估实践中的可信度:强调关系性。
Eval Program Plann. 2007 Nov;30(4):404-9. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2007.06.006. Epub 2007 Jul 10.
9
The government-academic "industrial" complex.
J Biol Response Mod. 1986 Apr;5(2):109-11.
10
Politics and public health ethics in practice: right and left meet right and wrong.实践中的政治与公共卫生伦理:左派与右派相遇,正确与错误碰撞。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2008 Jul-Aug;14(4):340-7. doi: 10.1097/01.PHH.0000324561.42039.47.

引用本文的文献

1
Advice from local/site evaluators: How to manage "up" within a large-scale initiative.来自当地/现场评估人员的建议:如何在大规模倡议中进行“向上”管理。
New Dir Eval. 2022 Summer;2022(174):79-95. doi: 10.1002/ev.20504. Epub 2022 Aug 8.