Zuckerberg Joaquin
Faculty of Law, University of Toronto, Canada.
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2007 Nov-Dec;30(6):512-29. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2007.09.005. Epub 2007 Oct 22.
This article is part of a working project which assesses Ontario's mental health legislation and practice vis-à-vis international human rights standards. The paper focuses on procedural safeguards provided by the major international human rights instruments in the field of mental health law such as the UN Principles for the Protection of Persons with Mental Illness (MI Principles) and the European Convention on Human Rights as interpreted by the European Human Rights Court. In analysing Ontario's compliance with international standards, the paper will explore some problems arising from the implementation of the legislation with which the author is familiar with from his experience as counsel for the Consent and Capacity Board. The paper aims to generate discussion for potential reforms in domestic legal systems and to provide a methodology to be used as a tool to assess similar mental health legislation in other local contexts.
本文是一个正在进行的项目的一部分,该项目对照国际人权标准评估安大略省的心理健康立法与实践。本文聚焦于心理健康法领域主要国际人权文书所提供的程序性保障措施,如联合国《保护精神疾病患者原则》(《精神疾病患者原则》)以及欧洲人权法院所解释的《欧洲人权公约》。在分析安大略省对国际标准的遵守情况时,本文将探讨因立法实施而产生的一些问题,这些问题是作者作为同意与能力委员会的法律顾问在其经历中所熟悉的。本文旨在引发关于国内法律制度潜在改革的讨论,并提供一种方法作为工具,用于评估其他地方背景下类似的心理健康立法。