Hay R J
American Type Culture Collection, Rockville, MD 20852.
Dev Biol Stand. 1991;75:193-204.
Operator-induced biological contamination in cell cultures is a multifaceted problem involving the unexpected introduction of other animal cells, microbial and viral contaminants. Detailed studies on animal cell cross contaminations have been performed and published. The frequency of detection of problem cultures has been as high as 36% for one service performed in the USA, with interspecific cross contamination accounting for 25% and human intraspecific contamination representing 11%. Awareness of the potential of this problem plus the application of several characterizations are key factors for its control. For example, fluorescent antibody staining, isoenzyme analyses, cytogenetic evaluations and DNA fingerprinting using molecular probes are needed for quality assurance on master seed stocks. Detection of microbial contamination is relatively straightforward, but the prevalence of mycoplasmal infections in cell cultures used in general research is still a significant problem. Detection services report frequencies of infection varying from 10% upwards, depending upon the country and laboratory of origin. The utilization of prescreened reagents and antibiotic-free cultivation, plus the application of improved procedures, such as fluorescent dyes and molecular probes for detection, provide effective means of avoiding mycoplasma infection and facilitating control. For many viruses, the presence of mycoplasma reduces immunoreactivity, suppresses transcriptase and other enzyme activities, reverses viral neutralization etc. The introduction of viral contaminants into cell cultures is perhaps the most problematic, especially where no cytopathic effect is produced. Few cases are documented where technicians infected with specific viruses have introduced these unwittingly into cultures in their care. The potential exists, however, as reports have appeared documenting the considerable stability of rhinoviruses, respiratory syncytial virus, rotaviruses and others, in aerosols on workers' hands and safety hood surfaces. The infection of cell cultures via other contaminated cells or reagents such as sera is a related problem. In this regard, the infection of transplantable tumor cell lines with lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus from host animals led to an outbreak of the disease in medical center personnel. Similar infection of rat cell lines exposed to animals harboring hantaviruses has been reported. Technical staff in US government laboratories have been infected with human immunodeficiency virus produced in cultured cells. Such serious public health hazards warrant repeated emphasis. The use of multiple cell lines in a given laboratory, including cultures known to be virally infected, compounds the problems and necessitates application of preventive methods both to avoid cross-infections and to document freedom from contamination.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
操作人员导致的细胞培养物生物污染是一个多方面的问题,涉及意外引入其他动物细胞、微生物和病毒污染物。关于动物细胞交叉污染的详细研究已经开展并发表。在美国进行的一项服务中,问题培养物的检测频率高达36%,种间交叉污染占25%,人类种内污染占11%。意识到这个问题的可能性以及应用多种特征分析是控制该问题的关键因素。例如,对于主种子库的质量保证,需要进行荧光抗体染色、同工酶分析、细胞遗传学评估以及使用分子探针进行DNA指纹识别。微生物污染的检测相对简单,但一般研究中使用的细胞培养物中支原体感染的发生率仍然是一个重大问题。检测服务报告的感染频率从10%以上不等,这取决于来源国和实验室。使用经过预筛选的试剂和无抗生素培养,再加上应用改进的程序,如用于检测的荧光染料和分子探针,提供了避免支原体感染和便于控制的有效手段。对于许多病毒来说,支原体的存在会降低免疫反应性、抑制转录酶和其他酶活性、逆转病毒中和等。将病毒污染物引入细胞培养物可能是最成问题的,尤其是在没有产生细胞病变效应的情况下。记录在案的案例很少,即感染特定病毒的技术人员在不知情的情况下将这些病毒引入他们所负责的培养物中。然而,这种可能性是存在的,因为有报告记录了鼻病毒、呼吸道合胞病毒、轮状病毒等在工作人员手上和气罩表面的气溶胶中具有相当的稳定性。通过其他受污染的细胞或试剂(如血清)感染细胞培养物是一个相关问题。在这方面,可移植肿瘤细胞系被来自宿主动物的淋巴细胞性脉络丛脑膜炎病毒感染,导致医疗中心人员爆发该疾病。也有报告称,接触携带汉坦病毒动物的大鼠细胞系发生了类似感染。美国政府实验室的技术人员曾被培养细胞中产生的人类免疫缺陷病毒感染。这种严重的公共卫生危害值得反复强调。在一个给定的实验室中使用多种细胞系,包括已知被病毒感染的培养物,会使问题更加复杂,因此有必要应用预防方法来避免交叉感染并证明没有污染。