Coronato S, Coto C E
Laboratorio de Virología, Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Rev Argent Microbiol. 1991 Jul-Sep;23(3):166-71.
Over a period of 4 years 200 cell cultures were analysed for the presence of mycoplasma. Cultures were established cell lines from different origins, namely monkey, mouse and human, hybrid cell cultures and primary cultures. The cultures belonged to various research and industrial laboratories located in different areas of the country. Seventy per cent of investigated cultures were found to be contaminated with mycoplasma using a DNA fluorescent stain. Fifty cultures, selected at random out of the contaminated cultures, were further investigated to identify the prevalent serotype. For that purpose immunofluorescent reactions were performed using immune sera raised against several mycoplasma strains routinely found among contaminated cultures. Forty one cultures were contaminated with a single type of mycoplasma, whereas in the remaining nine, two or even three serotypes were detected. Mycoplasma orale II contaminated 40% of single infected cultures, followed by M. hyorhinis and A. laidlawii-A (12% each), M. arginini (5%), M. orale III (8%), A. laidlawii-B (2%). We were unable to serotype the remaining positive cultures, because of the lack of a full battery of immune sera against all known serotypes. The prevalence of M. orale in mycoplasma contaminated cultures thus far tested, indicates that human handling would be the main source of infection. This situation could be modified by avoiding mouth pipetting and adopting good microbiological techniques.
在4年期间,对200份细胞培养物进行了支原体检测分析。这些培养物包括来自不同来源的细胞系,即猴、小鼠和人的细胞系、杂交细胞培养物以及原代培养物。这些培养物来自该国不同地区的各个研究和工业实验室。使用DNA荧光染色法发现,70%的被调查培养物受到支原体污染。从受污染的培养物中随机选取50份进行进一步调查,以确定流行的血清型。为此,使用针对在受污染培养物中经常发现的几种支原体菌株产生的免疫血清进行免疫荧光反应。41份培养物被单一类型的支原体污染,而在其余9份中,检测到两种甚至三种血清型。口腔支原体II污染了40%的单一感染培养物,其次是猪鼻支原体和莱氏无胆甾原体A(各占12%)、精氨酸支原体(5%)、口腔支原体III(8%)、莱氏无胆甾原体B(2%)。由于缺乏针对所有已知血清型的全套免疫血清,我们无法对其余阳性培养物进行血清分型。迄今为止检测的支原体污染培养物中口腔支原体的流行情况表明,人为操作可能是主要感染源。通过避免口吸移液并采用良好的微生物技术,可以改变这种情况。