DeHoff Paul H, Barrett Allyson A, Lee Robert B, Anusavice Kenneth J
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Engineering Science, Duke Centennial Hall, UNC Charlotte, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA.
Dent Mater. 2008 Jun;24(6):744-52. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2007.08.008. Epub 2007 Oct 18.
To test the hypothesis that bilayer ceramic cylinders and spheres can provide valid confirmation of thermal incompatibility stresses predicted by finite element analyses.
A commercial core ceramic and an experimental core ceramic were used to fabricate open-ended cylinders and core ceramic spheres. The core cylinders and spheres were veneered with one of four commercial dental ceramics representing four thermally compatible groups and four thermally incompatible groups. Axisymmetric thermal and viscoelastic elements in the ANSYS finite element program were used to calculate temperatures and stresses for each geometry and ceramic combination. This process required a transient heat transfer analysis for each combination to determine input temperatures for the structural model.
After fabrication, each specimen was examined visually using fiberoptic transillumination for evidence of cracking. There were 100% failures of the thermally incompatible cylinders while none of the thermally compatible combinations failed. Among the spheres, 100% of the thermally incompatible systems failed, 16% of one of the thermally compatible systems failed, and none of the remaining compatible combinations failed. The calculated stress values were in general agreement with the experimental observations, i.e., low residual stresses for the specimens that did not fail and high residual stresses for the specimens that did fail.
Simple screening geometries can be used to identify highly incompatible ceramic combinations, but they do not identify marginally incompatible systems.
验证双层陶瓷圆柱体和球体能够有效证实有限元分析预测的热不相容应力这一假设。
使用一种商用核心陶瓷和一种实验性核心陶瓷制作开口圆柱体和核心陶瓷球体。核心圆柱体和球体用四种商用牙科陶瓷之一进行贴面处理,这四种陶瓷分别代表四个热相容组和四个热不相容组。利用ANSYS有限元程序中的轴对称热和粘弹性单元计算每种几何形状和陶瓷组合的温度和应力。此过程需要对每种组合进行瞬态热传递分析,以确定结构模型的输入温度。
制作完成后,使用光纤透照法对每个试样进行目视检查,查看是否有裂纹迹象。热不相容圆柱体的失败率为100%,而热相容组合均未失败。在球体中,热不相容系统的失败率为100%,其中一个热相容系统的失败率为16%,其余相容组合均未失败。计算得到的应力值与实验观察结果总体一致,即未失败试样的残余应力较低,失败试样的残余应力较高。
简单的筛选几何形状可用于识别高度不相容的陶瓷组合,但无法识别边缘不相容系统。