Owen Neville, Cerin Ester, Leslie Eva, duToit Lorinne, Coffee Neil, Frank Lawrence D, Bauman Adrian E, Hugo Graeme, Saelens Brian E, Sallis James F
Cancer Prevention Research Centre, School of Population Health, The University of Queensland, Herston Road, Herston QLD 4006, Brisbane, Australia.
Am J Prev Med. 2007 Nov;33(5):387-95. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.07.025.
The physical attributes of residential neighborhoods, particularly the connectedness of streets and the proximity of destinations, can influence walking behaviors. To provide the evidence for public health advocacy on activity-friendly environments, large-scale studies in different countries are needed. Associations of neighborhood physical environments with adults' walking for transport and walking for recreation must be better understood.
Walking for transport and walking for recreation were assessed with a validated survey among 2650 adults recruited from neighborhoods in an Australian city between July 2003 and June 2004, with neighborhoods selected to have either high or low walkability, based on objective measures of connectedness and proximity derived from geographic information systems (GIS) databases. The study design was stratified by area-level socioeconomic status, while analyses controlled for participant age, gender, individual-level socioeconomic status, and reasons for neighborhood self-selection.
A strong independent positive association was found between weekly frequency of walking for transport and the objectively derived neighborhood walkability index. Preference for walkable neighborhoods moderated the relationship of walkability with weekly minutes, but not the frequency of walking for transport--walkability was related to higher frequency of transport walking, irrespective of neighborhood self-selection. There were no significant associations between environmental factors and walking for recreation.
Associations of neighborhood walkability attributes with walking for transport were confirmed in Australia. They accounted for a modest but statistically significant proportion of the total variation of the relevant walking behavior. The physical environment attributes that make up the walkability index are potentially important candidate factors for future environmental and policy initiatives designed to increase physical activity.
居民区的物理属性,特别是街道的连通性和目的地的 proximity,会影响步行行为。为了为倡导有利于活动的环境的公共卫生提供证据,需要在不同国家进行大规模研究。必须更好地理解邻里物理环境与成年人出行步行和休闲步行之间的关联。
在 2003 年 7 月至 2004 年 6 月期间,从澳大利亚一个城市的居民区招募了 2650 名成年人,通过一项经过验证的调查评估出行步行和休闲步行情况。根据从地理信息系统(GIS)数据库得出的连通性和 proximity 的客观测量值,选择具有高或低步行适宜性的居民区。研究设计按地区层面的社会经济地位进行分层,同时分析控制了参与者的年龄、性别、个人层面的社会经济地位以及邻里自我选择的原因。
发现出行步行的每周频率与客观得出的邻里步行适宜性指数之间存在强烈的独立正相关。对适宜步行邻里的偏好调节了步行适宜性与每周步行分钟数之间的关系,但未调节出行步行的频率——无论邻里自我选择如何,步行适宜性都与更高的出行步行频率相关。环境因素与休闲步行之间没有显著关联。
在澳大利亚证实了邻里步行适宜性属性与出行步行之间的关联。它们在相关步行行为的总变异中占了适度但具有统计学意义的比例。构成步行适宜性指数的物理环境属性可能是未来旨在增加身体活动的环境和政策举措的重要候选因素。