Szeto Wilson Y, Bavaria Joseph E, Bowen Frank W, Geirsson Arnar, Cornelius Katherine, Hargrove W Clark, Pochettino Alberto
Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Nov;84(5):1592-8; discussion 1598-9. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.05.049.
Reoperative aortic root reconstruction is increasingly performed and remains a clinical challenge. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcome of patients undergoing reoperative aortic root replacement after previous aortic surgery.
From 1995 to 2006, 156 consecutive patients underwent reoperative aortic root replacement after previous aortic valve replacement (group 1, n = 106, 67.8%), proximal aortic reconstruction (group 2, n = 25, 16.1%), and aortic root replacement (group 3, n = 25, 16.1%). Their records were retrospectively reviewed.
The mean age was 58.1 +/- 14.4 years, and 73.7% (n = 115) were men. Reoperation was performed 98.4 months after previous operation, with 14.7% (n = 23) having undergone three or more sternotomies. Indications for reoperations were endocarditis in 55 (35.3%), prosthetic valve dysfunction in 28 (17.9%), paravalvular leak in 12 (7.7%), aortic aneurysm or pseudoaneurysm in 29 (18.5%), aortic dissection in 12 (7.7%), and aortic stenosis or insufficiency in 20 (12.9%). Aortic root replacement was performed in all 156 patients, with concomitant hemiarch reconstruction in 62 (39.7%), Cabrol coronary reconstruction in 5 (3.2%), coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in 26 (16.6%), and mitral valve repair or replacement (MVR) in 25 (16.0%). Thirty-day mortality was 11.5% (n = 18). Actuarial survival was 86.4% +/- 2.7% at 1 year, 72.6% +/- 4.3% at 5 years, and 58.4% +/- 7.8% at 10 years. Subgroup analysis demonstrated no difference in 30-day mortality (group 1, 14.1%; group 2, 8.0%; group 3, 4.0%; p = 0.31) and late survival between the three groups (p = 0.14). Multivariate analysis demonstrated age older than 75 years (p = 0.03) and New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class IV (p = 0.05) as risk factors for 30-day mortality.
Reoperative aortic root reconstruction can be performed with a low perioperative mortality rate and satisfactory long-term survival. Age older than 75 years and NYHA class IV are risk factors for early mortality. Previous aortic root replacement is not a risk factor for reoperative aortic root reconstruction.
再次主动脉根部重建手术的开展日益增多,仍是一项临床挑战。本研究旨在评估既往接受主动脉手术后再次行主动脉根部置换患者的手术结果。
1995年至2006年,156例连续患者在既往接受主动脉瓣置换术后(第1组,n = 106,67.8%)、近端主动脉重建术后(第2组,n = 25,16.1%)及主动脉根部置换术后(第3组,n = 25,16.1%)接受再次主动脉根部置换。对他们的病历进行回顾性分析。
平均年龄为58.1±14.4岁,73.7%(n = 115)为男性。再次手术在既往手术98.4个月后进行,14.7%(n = 23)患者接受过3次或更多次胸骨切开术。再次手术的指征包括:心内膜炎55例(35.3%)、人工瓣膜功能障碍28例(17.9%)、瓣周漏12例(7.7%)、主动脉瘤或假性动脉瘤29例(18.5%)、主动脉夹层12例(7.7%)、主动脉狭窄或关闭不全20例(12.9%)。156例患者均接受主动脉根部置换,其中62例(39.7%)同期行半弓重建、5例(3.2%)行卡布罗冠状动脉重建、26例(16.6%)行冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)、25例(16.0%)行二尖瓣修复或置换(MVR)。30天死亡率为11.5%(n = 18)。1年、5年和10年的精算生存率分别为86.4%±2.7%、72.6%±4.3%和58.4%±7.8%。亚组分析显示,三组间30天死亡率(第1组,14.1%;第2组,8.0%;第3组,4.0%;p = 0.31)及远期生存率无差异(p = 0.14)。多因素分析显示,年龄大于75岁(p = 0.03)及纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能分级IV级(p = 0.05)是30天死亡率的危险因素。
再次主动脉根部重建手术围手术期死亡率低,长期生存率满意。年龄大于75岁及NYHA心功能分级IV级是早期死亡的危险因素。既往主动脉根部置换并非再次主动脉根部重建手术的危险因素。