Weinhandl Eric D, Rao Madhumati, Gilbertson David T, Collins Allan J, Pereira Brian J G
Chronic Disease Research Group, Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation, Minneapolis, MN 55404, USA.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2007 Nov;50(5):803-12. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.07.017.
Levocarnitine deficiency in hemodialysis patients is common. Although the effect of intravenous levocarnitine therapy was studied in small trials, the effect on global outcomes in larger populations is unclear.
Retrospective observational study.
SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services data; prevalent hemodialysis patients, 1998 to 2003.
Intravenous levocarnitine use, clinical characteristics, comorbid conditions.
OUTCOMES & MEASUREMENTS: Effect of 1 g or greater per dialysis session of levocarnitine for 10 or more sessions during a month on subsequent hospitalization days. Repeated-measures and marginal structural models were fit, the latter to account for time-dependent confounding.
Of the study population, 3% to 7% received levocarnitine for 1 month per year or more. Treated patients were older with more severe comorbidity and larger erythropoietin doses than untreated patients. In repeated-measures model analysis adjusted for demographic characteristics and disease severity, 1 g or greater per dialysis session of levocarnitine for 10 or more sessions during a month was associated with a 10.8% (95% confidence interval, 9.7 to 11.9; P < 0.01) subsequent-month decrease in hospitalization days. In marginal structural model analysis, levocarnitine therapy was associated with a 21.7% (95% confidence interval, 18.4 to 24.9; P < 0.01) decrease in hospitalization days.
Algorithm for identifying comorbid conditions from claims validated only for diabetes; biochemical marker levels unavailable in Medicare claims; levocarnitine therapy quantified only while patients were not hospitalized.
Because hemodialysis patients are hospitalized about 15 days yearly, the association of monthly levocarnitine regimen with lower hospitalization rate is clinically significant. The causality of this association must be confirmed by randomized clinical trials.
血液透析患者中左旋肉碱缺乏很常见。尽管在小型试验中研究了静脉注射左旋肉碱治疗的效果,但对更大人群总体结局的影响尚不清楚。
回顾性观察研究。
医疗保险与医疗补助服务中心的数据;1998年至2003年的现患血液透析患者。
静脉使用左旋肉碱、临床特征、合并症。
每月每透析疗程使用1克或更多左旋肉碱且持续10个或更多疗程对随后住院天数的影响。采用重复测量和边际结构模型进行拟合,后者用于处理随时间变化的混杂因素。
在研究人群中,3%至7%的患者每年接受左旋肉碱治疗1个月或更长时间。与未治疗的患者相比,接受治疗的患者年龄更大,合并症更严重,促红细胞生成素剂量更大。在针对人口统计学特征和疾病严重程度进行调整的重复测量模型分析中,每月每透析疗程使用1克或更多左旋肉碱且持续10个或更多疗程与随后一个月住院天数减少10.8%(95%置信区间为9.7至11.9;P<0.01)相关。在边际结构模型分析中,左旋肉碱治疗与住院天数减少21.7%(95%置信区间为18.4至24.9;P<0.01)相关。
从索赔记录中识别合并症的算法仅针对糖尿病进行了验证;医疗保险索赔记录中没有生化标志物水平数据;仅在患者未住院期间对左旋肉碱治疗进行了量化。
由于血液透析患者每年约住院15天,每月左旋肉碱治疗方案与较低住院率之间的关联具有临床意义。这种关联的因果关系必须通过随机临床试验来证实。