Xiang Huiyun, Yu Songlin, Zhang Xiaofei, Scurlock Carissa, Smith Gary A, Stallones Lorann
Center for Injury Research and Policy, Columbus Children's Research Institute, Columbus, OH, USA.
Ann Epidemiol. 2007 Nov;17(11):889-98. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.05.008.
This study compared 10 risk-taking behaviors generally considered to be risk factors for injuries and unintentional nonfatal injuries between immigrant and U.S.-born adults.
Data from the 2001 to 2002 National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions were analyzed. The prevalence of unintentional injuries that occurred in the past 12 months was calculated for foreign-born and U.S.-born respondents by major sociodemographic characteristics. The proportion of respondents who were involved in risk-taking behaviors was compared between immigrants and U.S.-born adults using a chi(2) test. Negative binominal Poisson regression models were used to study the association among immigrant status, total number of risk-taking behaviors, and injuries while controlling for the confounding effects of sociodemographic variables.
Of 43,093 adult respondents, 13.3% (95% confidence intervals [CI] = 12.5%-14.1%) of immigrants reported injuries compared with 19.1% (95% CI = 18.7%-19.5%) of U.S.-born respondents. Immigrants had a significantly lower risk of unintentional injuries than U.S.-born adults by most sociodemographic characteristics, but there was no statistically significant association between years of U.S. residence and injuries. Immigrants were less likely than their U.S.-born counterparts to be involved in all 10 risk-taking behaviors (p < 0.05 from chi(2) test). However, when immigrants engaged in more than four risk-taking behaviors, the difference in injury prevalence between the two groups was not statistically significant (p > 0.05).
Immigrant and U.S.-born adults involved in high-risk behaviors face similar risks for unintentional injuries. Targeting risk-taking behaviors among immigrants warrants special attention in injury-control programs.
本研究比较了移民成年人与美国本土成年人之间10种通常被认为是伤害和非故意伤害风险因素的冒险行为。
分析了2001年至2002年全国酒精及相关状况流行病学调查的数据。按主要社会人口学特征计算外国出生和美国出生受访者在过去12个月中发生的非故意伤害的患病率。使用卡方检验比较移民和美国本土成年人中参与冒险行为的受访者比例。在控制社会人口学变量的混杂效应的同时,使用负二项式泊松回归模型研究移民身份、冒险行为总数和伤害之间的关联。
在43,093名成年受访者中,13.3%(95%置信区间[CI]=12.5%-14.1%)的移民报告有伤害,而美国本土受访者为19.1%(95%CI=18.7%-19.5%)。按大多数社会人口学特征,移民遭受非故意伤害的风险显著低于美国本土成年人,但在美国居住年限与伤害之间没有统计学上的显著关联。移民比美国本土同龄人参与所有10种冒险行为的可能性更小(卡方检验p<0.05)。然而,当移民参与超过四种冒险行为时,两组之间的伤害患病率差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。
参与高风险行为的移民成年人和美国本土成年人面临类似的非故意伤害风险。在伤害控制项目中,针对移民中的冒险行为需要特别关注。