Ashraf S Q, Bajwa A, Magee T R, Galland R B
Department of Surgery, Royal Berkshire Hospital, Reading, UK.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007 Oct;89(7):682-4. doi: 10.1308/003588407X209284.
There is considerable debate as to whether vascular surgery should be a subspecialty separate from general surgery. This study examines the changing relationship between general and vascular surgery in a district general surgical unit over 16 years.
A detailed survey of referrals, admissions and operations to one unit was carried out over 3 months in 2003. This was compared with similar surveys in 1989, 1990 and 1995. In addition a 3-month audit of operations performed was carried out in 2005 following a decision by the Primary Care Trust (PCT) to reduce varicose vein referrals.
There was a significant increase in the number of varicose vein and arterial referrals 1989-2003 (P = 0.0001 and P < 0.0001, respectively). This was reflected in increased number of vascular admissions (P < 0.0001). In 1989, 14% of the arterial cases were admitted as emergencies. This figure rose to 52% in 2003 (P < 0.0001). There was a significant increase in the number of arterial operations performed between 1989 and 1995; however, from 1995 to 2003 this number fell P < 0.0001). The number of varicose vein procedures increased significantly 1989-2003 (P < 0.0001), with a significant fall after the PCT decision (P < 0.0001). However, the number of operations carried out in 2005 increased slightly with the proportion of general surgical cases, mostly hernia repairs and laparoscopic cholecystectomies, increasing.
With increasing specialisation comes the risk that reduction in any aspect of a particular specialty may result in that unit becoming unsustainable. In vascular surgery this will inevitably lead to centralisation of services. In a large district general hospital having two general surgeons with a vascular interest, the general surgical component has maintained the workload of the unit following reduction in varicose vein referrals.
关于血管外科是否应作为一个独立于普通外科的亚专业存在,存在着相当大的争议。本研究考察了一个地区普通外科单位在16年期间普通外科与血管外科之间不断变化的关系。
2003年对一个单位的转诊、入院及手术情况进行了为期3个月的详细调查。并将其与1989年、1990年和1995年的类似调查进行比较。此外,在初级保健信托基金(PCT)决定减少静脉曲张转诊后,于2005年对所施行的手术进行了为期3个月的审核。
1989年至2003年,静脉曲张和动脉疾病的转诊数量显著增加(分别为P = 0.0001和P < 0.0001)。这反映在血管外科入院人数的增加上(P < 0.0001)。1989年,14%的动脉疾病病例为急诊入院。这一数字在2003年升至52%(P < 0.0001)。1989年至1995年期间,动脉手术的数量显著增加;然而,从1995年到2003年,这一数量下降了(P < 0.0001)。1989年至2003年,静脉曲张手术的数量显著增加(P < 0.0001),在PCT做出决定后显著下降(P < 0.0001)。然而,2005年施行的手术数量略有增加,普通外科病例的比例增加,主要是疝修补术和腹腔镜胆囊切除术。
随着专业化程度的提高,存在这样一种风险,即特定专业任何方面的减少都可能导致该单位无法持续运营。在血管外科领域,这将不可避免地导致服务集中化。在一家拥有两名对血管外科感兴趣的普通外科医生的大型地区综合医院,在静脉曲张转诊减少后,普通外科部分维持了该单位的工作量。