Suppr超能文献

对于原发灶不明的癌症(CUP)患者,采用全脑放疗,20 Gy分5次进行,用于治疗脑转移瘤。

Whole-brain radiotherapy with 20 Gy in 5 fractions for brain metastases in patients with cancer of unknown primary (CUP).

作者信息

Rades Dirk, Bohlen Guenther, Lohynska Radka, Veninga Theo, Stalpers Lukas J A, Schild Steven E, Dunst Juergen

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Luebeck, Germany.

出版信息

Strahlenther Onkol. 2007 Nov;183(11):631-6. doi: 10.1007/s00066-007-1763-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is the most common treatment for brain metastases. Survival of patients with cancer of unknown primary (CUP) presenting with brain metastases is extremely poor. A radiation program with a short overall treatment time (short-course RT) would be preferable to longer programs if it provides similar outcomes. This study compares short-course RT with 20 Gy in 5 fractions (5 x 4 Gy) given over 5 days to longer programs in CUP patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data regarding 101 CUP patients who received either short course WBRT (n=34) with 5 x 4 Gy or long-course WBRT (n=67) with 10 x 3 Gy given over 2 weeks or 20 x 2 Gy given over 4 weeks for brain metastases were analyzed retrospectively. Six additional potential prognostic factors were investigated: age, gender, Karnofsky performance score (KPS), number of brain metastases, extracranial metastases, RPA-(Recursive Partitioning Analysis-)class.

RESULTS

On univariate analysis, the radiation program was not associated with survival (p=0.88) nor intracerebral control (p=0.36). Improved survival was associated with KPS >or= 70 (p<0.001), absence of extracranial metastases (p<0.001), and RPA-class 1 (p<0.001). On multivariate analyses, KPS (risk ratio [RR]: 4.55; p<0.001), extracranial metastases (RR: 1.70; p=0.018), and RPA-class (RR: 2.86; p<0.001) maintained significance. On univariate analysis, KPS (p<0.001) and RPA-class (p<0.001) were significantly associated with intracerebral control. On multivariate analyses, KPS (RR: 2.72; p<0.001) and RPA-class (RR: 2.09; p<0.001) remained significant.

CONCLUSION

Short-course WBRT with 5 x 4 Gy provided similar intracerebral control and survival as longer programs for the treatment of brain metastases in CUP patients. 5 x 4 Gy appears preferable because it is more convenient for patients.

摘要

背景

全脑放疗(WBRT)是脑转移瘤最常见的治疗方法。出现脑转移的原发灶不明癌症(CUP)患者的生存率极低。如果能提供相似的治疗效果,总体治疗时间较短的放疗方案(短程放疗)会比更长疗程的方案更可取。本研究比较了在CUP患者中短程放疗(5天内给予20 Gy,分5次,每次4 Gy)与更长疗程放疗方案的效果。

患者与方法

回顾性分析了101例接受脑转移瘤治疗的CUP患者的数据,其中34例接受短程WBRT(5×4 Gy),67例接受长程WBRT(2周内给予10×3 Gy或4周内给予20×2 Gy)。还研究了另外6个潜在的预后因素:年龄、性别、卡氏功能状态评分(KPS)、脑转移瘤数量、颅外转移、递归分区分析(RPA)分级。

结果

单因素分析显示,放疗方案与生存率(p = 0.88)和脑内控制率(p = 0.36)均无关。生存率的提高与KPS≥70(p<0.001)、无颅外转移(p<0.001)和RPA 1级(p<0.001)相关。多因素分析显示,KPS(风险比[RR]:4.55;p<0.001)、颅外转移(RR:1.70;p = 0.018)和RPA分级(RR:2.86;p<0.001)仍具有显著意义。单因素分析显示,KPS(p<0.001)和RPA分级(p<0.001)与脑内控制显著相关。多因素分析显示,KPS(RR:2.72;p<0.001)和RPA分级(RR:2.09;p<0.001)仍然具有显著意义。

结论

对于CUP患者脑转移瘤的治疗,5×4 Gy的短程WBRT与更长疗程的方案在脑内控制和生存率方面相似。5×4 Gy似乎更可取,因为它对患者更方便。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验