Suppr超能文献

[喀麦隆杜阿拉2004年霍乱疫情期间的大规模选择性抗生素预防措施]

[Large-scale selective antibiotic prophylaxis during the 2004 cholera outbreak in Douala (Cameroon)].

作者信息

Guévart Edouard, Noeske Jürgen, Sollé Jérémie, Mouangue Antoine, Bikoti Joseph-Marie

机构信息

Délégation provinciale de la santé publique du Littoral, BP 1329, Douala Cameroun.

出版信息

Sante. 2007 Apr-Jun;17(2):63-8.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

During the 2004 cholera outbreak in Douala, densely populated and poor suburban populations had very poor access to safe drinking water and were at high risk of transmission. The provincial task force thus decided to provide preventive antibiotic treatment of all patient contacts, that is, family members taking care of patients in the hospital and household members of patients or close neighbours living in houses directly adjacent to patients.

METHODOLOGY

This retrospective report, based on data from hospitals, local cholera committees, and pharmacies, describes the course of the epidemic, bacteriological monitoring, and antibiotic distribution.

RESULTS

Suddenly appearing in January 2004, the outbreak affected 5,020 patients in 8 months. V.cholerae, which was isolated in 111/187 samples, remained susceptible to doxycycline, amoxicillin, and fluoroquinolones. A total of 182,366 persons (35 contacts per patient) received antibiotic treatment. The rate of contacts among new patients fell from 30% to less than 0.2%.

DISCUSSION

Antibiotic prophylaxis was a part of a comprehensive package of community interventions that included health education, disinfection of homes, latrines and wells in all affected households, and bacteriological monitoring. Although it reduces the risk of the disease, mass antibiotic prophylaxis is not recommended against cholera outbreaks, because it does not prevent contamination and is limited by contraindications, costs, and modes of administration. Moreover, it increases the risk of developing resistance. It is impossible to eradicate vibrio from the environment. The individual risk of contracting cholera is not known and it is difficult to assess the impact of a collective prevention strategy. Because the bacteria remains susceptible to antibiotic drugs, a well-targeted antibiotic prophylaxis made it possible to reduce direct human transmission of cholera. This reduction did not affect the overall epidemic, however, because of the massive environmental contamination.

CONCLUSION

The role of chemoprophylaxis in limiting cholera epidemics is difficult to ascertain. Large-scale prophylaxis should be selective and limited to close contacts, in accordance with WHO recommendations, with rigorous application and monitoring of both integrated prevention procedures and antibiotic susceptibility.

摘要

引言

在2004年杜阿拉霍乱疫情期间,人口密集且贫困的郊区居民极难获得安全饮用水,面临着很高的传播风险。因此,省级特别工作组决定对所有接触者进行预防性抗生素治疗,即照顾住院患者的家庭成员、患者的家庭成员或居住在与患者直接相邻房屋中的近邻。

方法

本回顾性报告基于医院、当地霍乱委员会和药房的数据,描述了疫情的发展过程、细菌学监测和抗生素分发情况。

结果

疫情于2004年1月突然爆发,8个月内影响了5020名患者。在187份样本中的111份分离出霍乱弧菌,该菌对强力霉素、阿莫西林和氟喹诺酮类药物仍敏感。共有182366人(每位患者35名接触者)接受了抗生素治疗。新患者之间的接触率从30%降至不到0.2%。

讨论

抗生素预防是社区综合干预措施的一部分,这些措施包括健康教育、对所有受影响家庭的房屋、厕所和水井进行消毒以及细菌学监测。尽管抗生素预防降低了疾病风险,但不建议针对霍乱疫情进行大规模抗生素预防,因为它无法防止污染,且受到禁忌症、成本和给药方式的限制。此外,它还增加了产生耐药性的风险。不可能从环境中根除弧菌。感染霍乱的个体风险未知,且难以评估集体预防策略的影响。由于该细菌对抗生素药物仍敏感,针对性强的抗生素预防使得减少霍乱的人际直接传播成为可能。然而,由于大规模的环境污染,这种减少并未影响总体疫情。

结论

化学预防在控制霍乱疫情中的作用难以确定。根据世界卫生组织的建议,大规模预防应具有选择性,仅限于密切接触者,并应严格实施和监测综合预防程序及抗生素敏感性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验