Miller Ann Neville, Fellows Kelli L, Kizito Mary N
Communication Department, Daystar University, Nairobi, Kenya.
Health Commun. 2007;22(3):207-19. doi: 10.1080/10410230701626729.
This study examined the impact of controllability of onset (i.e., means of transmission), disease type (HIV and lung cancer), and culture (Kenya and U.S.) on stigmatizing attitudes and goals for supportive communication. Four hundred sixty-four Kenyan students and 526 American students, and 441 Kenyan nonstudents and 591 American nonstudents were randomly assigned to 1 of 12 hypothetical scenario conditions and asked to respond to questions regarding 3 different types of stigmatizing attitudes and 6 types of supportive communication goals with respect to the character in the scenario. Means of transmission had a strong effect on the blame component of stigma, but none on cognitive attitudes and social interaction components. Similarly, although an effect for means of transmission emerged on intention to provide "recognize own responsibility" and "see others' blame" types of support, no effect was evident for most other supportive interaction goals. Although effects for culture were small, Kenyan participants, student and nonstudent alike, were not as quick as American participants to adopt goals of communicating blame in any direction. Implications for measurement of stigma in future research are discussed.
本研究考察了发病的可控性(即传播方式)、疾病类型(艾滋病和肺癌)以及文化(肯尼亚和美国)对污名化态度和支持性沟通目标的影响。464名肯尼亚学生和526名美国学生,以及441名肯尼亚非学生和591名美国非学生被随机分配到12种假设情景条件中的一种,并被要求回答关于情景中人物的3种不同类型的污名化态度和6种支持性沟通目标的问题。传播方式对污名的责备成分有强烈影响,但对认知态度和社会互动成分没有影响。同样,虽然传播方式对提供“认识到自己的责任”和“看到他人的责备”类型支持的意图有影响,但对大多数其他支持性互动目标没有明显影响。虽然文化的影响很小,但肯尼亚参与者,无论学生还是非学生,在采取任何方向传达责备的目标方面都不如美国参与者迅速。讨论了对未来研究中污名测量的启示。