Chung Chi Chiu, Ng Dennis Chung Kei, Tsang Wilson Wen Chieng, Tang Wai Lun, Yau Kevin Kwok Kay, Cheung Hester Yui Shan, Wong James Cheuk Hoo, Li Michael Ka Wah
Department of Surgery, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, 3 Lok Man Road, Chai Wan, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Ann Surg. 2007 Nov;246(5):728-33. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318123fbdf.
Laparoscopic colectomy has been proved to be both technically and oncologically feasible. However, the approach has been criticized for its procedural complexity and long operative time as a result of the loss of tactile feedback and absence of depth perception. The advent of hand-access devices offered a potential solution to these problems. This randomized controlled trial aims to compare hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy (HALC) with open colectomy (OC) in the management of right-sided colonic cancer.
Adult patients with nonmetastatic carcinoma of cancer or ascending colon were recruited. Patients were excluded if they presented with surgical emergencies, had synchronous tumors on work-up, or when the tumor was larger than 6.5 cm in any dimension or preoperative imaging. Recruited patients were randomized to undergo either HALC or OC by the same surgical team. Outcome measures included operative time, blood loss, postoperative pain score and analgesic requirement, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, as well as disease recurrence and patient survival.
Eighty-one patients (HALC = 41, OC = 40) were successfully recruited. The 2 groups were matched for age, gender distribution, body mass index, and comorbidities. No significant difference was observed between the 2 groups in the distribution of tumors and the final histopathological staging. HALC took significantly longer than OC (110 min vs. 97.5 minutes, P = 0.003) but resulted in significantly less blood loss (35 mL vs. 50 mL, P = 0.005). Patients after HALC experienced significantly less pain, required significantly less parenteral and enteral analgesia, recovered faster, and was associated with a shorter length of stay (7 days vs. 9 days, P = 0.004). With median follow-up of 28 to 30 months, no difference was observed in terms of disease recurrence, and the 5-year survival rates remained similar (83% vs. 74%, P = 0.90).
HALC retained the same short-term benefits of the pure laparoscopic approach. The technique is associated with a slightly increased but acceptable operative time. Aside as a useful adjunct in complex laparoscopic procedures, the hand-assisted laparoscopic technique is also a useful, if not more effective, alternative for patients with right-sided colonic cancer.
腹腔镜结肠切除术已被证明在技术和肿瘤学方面都是可行的。然而,由于失去触觉反馈和缺乏深度感知,该方法因其手术复杂性和手术时间长而受到批评。手辅助设备的出现为这些问题提供了一个潜在的解决方案。这项随机对照试验旨在比较手辅助腹腔镜结肠切除术(HALC)与开放结肠切除术(OC)在右侧结肠癌治疗中的效果。
招募患有非转移性癌或升结肠癌的成年患者。如果患者出现手术急症、检查时发现同步肿瘤、肿瘤任何维度大于6.5 cm或术前影像学检查发现异常,则将其排除。招募的患者由同一手术团队随机分配接受HALC或OC。观察指标包括手术时间、失血量、术后疼痛评分和镇痛需求、住院时间、术后并发症以及疾病复发和患者生存率。
成功招募了81名患者(HALC组 = 41名,OC组 = 40名)。两组在年龄、性别分布、体重指数和合并症方面相匹配。两组在肿瘤分布和最终组织病理学分期方面未观察到显著差异。HALC的手术时间明显长于OC(110分钟对97.5分钟,P = 0.003),但失血量明显较少(35毫升对50毫升,P = 0.005)。HALC术后患者疼痛明显减轻,肠外和肠内镇痛需求明显减少,恢复更快,住院时间更短(7天对9天,P = 0.004)。中位随访28至30个月,疾病复发方面未观察到差异,5年生存率相似(83%对74%,P = 0.90)。
HALC保留了纯腹腔镜手术方法的相同短期益处。该技术的手术时间略有增加,但仍可接受。除了作为复杂腹腔镜手术的有用辅助手段外,手辅助腹腔镜技术对于右侧结肠癌患者也是一种有用的(如果不是更有效的)替代方法。