Baumann C R, Marti I, Bassetti C L
Department of Neurology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Eur J Neurol. 2007 Dec;14(12):1369-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2007.01981.x. Epub 2007 Oct 26.
Patients fulfilling the essential criteria for restless legs syndrome (RLS), but in whom the response to conventional dopaminergic treatment and the presence of periodic limb movements in sleep (PLMS) are lacking, are occasionally encountered. The aim of this study was to systematically characterize this population. In a consecutive series of 117 patients fulfilling the essential criteria for RLS, we assessed the presence of the following supportive criteria: PLMS >15/h on polysomnography, and favourable response to dopaminergic treatment. We differentiated patients with 'classical RLS' (RLS-C; fulfilling at least one of the selected supportive criteria) from those with 'RLS-like syndrome' (RLS-L) in whom supportive criteria were not fulfilled. There were 103 RLS-C and 14 RLS-L patients. Compared with RLS-C patients, RLS-L patients were significantly younger, more severely affected by RSL symptoms, and were more probably to suffer from psychiatric comorbidities, than RLS-C patients. This study proves the existence of patients with severe RLS symptoms, but without PLMS and without response to dopaminergic treatment, who are clinically distinct from patients with 'classical RLS'.
偶尔会遇到符合不宁腿综合征(RLS)基本标准,但对传统多巴胺能治疗无反应且睡眠中无周期性肢体运动(PLMS)的患者。本研究的目的是系统地描述这一人群的特征。在连续的117例符合RLS基本标准的患者中,我们评估了以下支持性标准的存在情况:多导睡眠图显示PLMS>15次/小时,以及对多巴胺能治疗有良好反应。我们将符合“经典RLS”(RLS-C;符合至少一项所选支持性标准)的患者与不符合支持性标准的“类RLS综合征”(RLS-L)患者区分开来。有103例RLS-C患者和14例RLS-L患者。与RLS-C患者相比,RLS-L患者明显更年轻,受RLS症状影响更严重,且比RLS-C患者更可能患有精神科合并症。这项研究证明了存在严重RLS症状但无PLMS且对多巴胺能治疗无反应的患者,他们在临床上与“经典RLS”患者不同。