Levy Michael J, Topazian Mark D, Wiersema Maurits J, Clain Jonathan E, Rajan Elizabeth, Wang Kenneth K, de la Mora Jose G, Gleeson Ferga C, Pearson Randall K, Pelaez Mario C, Petersen Bret T, Vege Santhi S, Chari Suresh T
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2008 Jan;103(1):98-103. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01607.x. Epub 2007 Oct 26.
Celiac plexus neurolysis and block are considered safe but provide limited pain relief. Standard techniques target the region of the celiac plexus but do not attempt injections directly into celiac ganglia. The recent recognition that celiac ganglia can be visualized by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) now allows direct injection into celiac ganglia for neurolysis (CGN) and block (CGB).
To determine the safety and initial efficacy (at 2-4 wk) of direct ganglia injection in patients with moderate to severe pain secondary to unresectable pancreatic carcinoma or chronic pancreatitis.
An EUS database was reviewed to identify patients undergoing CGN and CGB. Data were retrieved from the medical records and phone follow-up.
Thirty-three patients underwent 36 direct celiac ganglia injections for unresectable pancreatic cancer (CGN N = 17, CGB N = 1) or chronic pancreatitis (CGN N = 5, CGB N = 13) with bupivacaine (0.25%) and alcohol (99%) for CGN, or Depo-Medrol (80 mg/2 cc) for CGB. Cancer patients reported pain relief in 16/17 (94%) when alcohol was injected and 0/1 (00%) when steroid was injected. For chronic pancreatitis, 4/5 (80%) who received alcohol reported pain relief versus 5/13 (38%) receiving steroids. Thirteen (34%) patients experienced initial pain exacerbation, which correlated with improved therapeutic response (P < 0.05). Transient hypotension and diarrhea developed in 12 and 6 patients, respectively.
Initial experience suggests that EUS-guided direct celiac ganglion block or neurolysis is safe. Alcohol injection into ganglia appears to be effective in both cancer and chronic pancreatitis. Prospective trials are needed to confirm the efficacy of this new approach.
腹腔神经丛神经溶解术和阻滞术被认为是安全的,但止痛效果有限。标准技术针对腹腔神经丛区域,但不尝试直接向腹腔神经节内注射。最近认识到可通过内镜超声(EUS)观察到腹腔神经节,这使得现在能够直接向腹腔神经节内注射以进行神经溶解术(CGN)和阻滞术(CGB)。
确定对不可切除胰腺癌或慢性胰腺炎继发的中重度疼痛患者进行直接神经节内注射的安全性和初始疗效(2 - 4周时)。
回顾EUS数据库以识别接受CGN和CGB的患者。数据从病历和电话随访中获取。
33例患者因不可切除胰腺癌(CGN 17例,CGB 1例)或慢性胰腺炎(CGN 5例,CGB 13例)接受了36次直接腹腔神经节内注射,CGN使用布比卡因(0.25%)和酒精(99%),CGB使用得宝松(80 mg/2 cc)。癌症患者中,注射酒精时16/17(94%)报告疼痛缓解,注射类固醇时0/1(0%)报告疼痛缓解。对于慢性胰腺炎,接受酒精注射的4/5(80%)报告疼痛缓解,而接受类固醇注射的5/13(38%)报告疼痛缓解。13例(34%)患者出现初始疼痛加剧,这与治疗反应改善相关(P < 0.05)。分别有12例和6例患者出现短暂性低血压和腹泻。
初步经验表明,EUS引导下的直接腹腔神经节阻滞或神经溶解术是安全的。向神经节内注射酒精在癌症和慢性胰腺炎中似乎均有效。需要进行前瞻性试验以证实这种新方法的疗效。