Kam Michael K M, Leung Sing-Fai, Zee Benny, Chau Ricky M C, Suen Joyce J S, Mo Frankie, Lai Maria, Ho Rosalie, Cheung Kin-yin, Yu Brian K H, Chiu Samuel K W, Choi Peter H K, Teo Peter M L, Kwan Wing-hong, Chan Anthony T C
State Key Laboratory in Oncology in South China, Sir Y.K. Pao Centre for Cancer, Department of Clinical Oncology, Hong Kong Cancer Institute, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.
J Clin Oncol. 2007 Nov 1;25(31):4873-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.11.5501.
This randomized trial compared the rates of delayed xerostomia between two-dimensional radiation therapy (2DRT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in the treatment of early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).
Between November 2001 and December 2003, 60 patients with T1-2bN0-1M0 NPC were randomly assigned to receive either IMRT or 2DRT. Primary end point was incidence of observer-rated severe xerostomia at 1 year after treatment based on Radiotherapy Oncology Group /European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer late radiation morbidity scoring criteria. Parallel assessment with patient-reported outcome, stimulated parotid flow rate (SPFR), and stimulated whole saliva flow rate (SWSFR) were also made.
At 1 year after treatment, patients in IMRT arm had lower incidence of observer-rated severe xerostomia than patients in the 2DRT arm (39.3% v 82.1%; P = .001), parallel with a higher fractional SPFR (0.90 v 0.05; P < .0001), and higher fractional SWSFR (0.41 v 0.20; P = .001). As for patient's subjective feeling, although a trend of improvement in patient-reported outcome was observed after IMRT, recovery was incomplete and there was no significant difference in patient-reported outcome between the two arms.
IMRT is superior to 2DRT in preserving parotid function and results in less severe delayed xerostomia in the treatment of early-stage NPC. Incomplete improvement in patient's subjective xerostomia with parotid-sparing IMRT reflects the need to enhance protection of other salivary glands.
本随机试验比较了二维放射治疗(2DRT)和调强放射治疗(IMRT)在早期鼻咽癌(NPC)治疗中迟发性口干的发生率。
2001年11月至2003年12月期间,60例T1-2bN0-1M0期鼻咽癌患者被随机分配接受IMRT或2DRT治疗。主要终点是根据放射肿瘤学组/欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织晚期放射损伤评分标准,治疗后1年观察者评定的严重口干发生率。还对患者报告的结果、刺激腮腺流速(SPFR)和刺激全唾液流速(SWSFR)进行了平行评估。
治疗后1年,IMRT组患者观察者评定的严重口干发生率低于2DRT组(39.3%对82.1%;P = 0.001),同时SPFR分数更高(0.90对0.05;P < 0.0001),SWSFR分数更高(0.41对0.20;P = 0.001)。至于患者的主观感受,尽管IMRT后患者报告的结果有改善趋势,但恢复不完全,两组患者报告的结果无显著差异。
在早期鼻咽癌的治疗中,IMRT在保留腮腺功能方面优于2DRT,导致迟发性口干的严重程度更低。保留腮腺的IMRT在患者主观口干方面改善不完全,这反映了需要加强对其他唾液腺的保护。