Suppr超能文献

在内科住院医师诊所使用登记生成的审核、反馈和患者提醒干预——一项随机试验。

Use of a registry-generated audit, feedback, and patient reminder intervention in an internal medicine resident clinic--a randomized trial.

作者信息

Thomas Kris G, Thomas Matthew R, Stroebel Robert J, McDonald Furman S, Hanson Gregory J, Naessens James M, Huschka Todd R, Kolars Joseph C

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2007 Dec;22(12):1740-4. doi: 10.1007/s11606-007-0431-x. Epub 2007 Nov 1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Disease registries, audit and feedback, and clinical reminders have been reported to improve care processes.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effects of a registry-generated audit, feedback, and patient reminder intervention on diabetes care.

DESIGN

Randomized controlled trial conducted in a resident continuity clinic during the 2003-2004 academic year.

PARTICIPANTS

Seventy-eight categorical Internal Medicine residents caring for 483 diabetic patients participated. Residents randomized to the intervention (n = 39) received instruction on diabetes registry use; quarterly performance audit, feedback, and written reports identifying patients needing care; and had letters sent quarterly to patients needing hemoglobin A1c or cholesterol testing. Residents randomized to the control group (n = 39) received usual clinic education.

MEASUREMENTS

Hemoglobin A1c and lipid monitoring, and the achievement of intermediate clinical outcomes (hemoglobin A1c <7.0%, LDL cholesterol <100 mg/dL, and blood pressure <130/85 mmHg) were assessed.

RESULTS

Patients cared for by residents in the intervention group had higher adherence to guideline recommendations for hemoglobin A1c testing (61.5% vs 48.1%, p = .01) and LDL testing (75.8% vs 64.1%, p = .02). Intermediate clinical outcomes were not different between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of a registry-generated audit, feedback, and patient reminder intervention in a resident continuity clinic modestly improved diabetes care processes, but did not influence intermediate clinical outcomes.

摘要

背景

据报道,疾病登记、审核与反馈以及临床提醒可改善医疗过程。

目的

评估基于登记系统生成的审核、反馈及患者提醒干预措施对糖尿病护理的影响。

设计

于2003 - 2004学年在住院医师连续性诊所进行的随机对照试验。

参与者

78名负责护理483名糖尿病患者的内科住院医师参与其中。随机分配至干预组(n = 39)的住院医师接受了关于糖尿病登记系统使用的指导;每季度进行绩效审核、反馈,并收到识别需要护理患者的书面报告;且每季度会给需要进行糖化血红蛋白或胆固醇检测的患者发送信件。随机分配至对照组(n = 39)的住院医师接受常规诊所教育。

测量指标

评估糖化血红蛋白和血脂监测情况,以及中间临床结局的达成情况(糖化血红蛋白<7.0%、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇<100 mg/dL、血压<130/85 mmHg)。

结果

干预组住院医师护理的患者对糖化血红蛋白检测指南建议的依从性更高(61.5%对48.1%,p = 0.01),对低密度脂蛋白检测的依从性也更高(75.8%对64.1%,p = 0.02)。两组之间的中间临床结局无差异。

结论

在住院医师连续性诊所使用基于登记系统生成的审核、反馈及患者提醒干预措施适度改善了糖尿病护理过程,但未影响中间临床结局。

相似文献

2
Pharmacist recommendations to improve the quality of diabetes care: a randomized controlled trial.
J Manag Care Pharm. 2010 Mar;16(2):104-13. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2010.16.2.104.
6
The effect of physician continuity on diabetic outcomes in a resident continuity clinic.
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Jul;23(7):937-41. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0654-5.
8
A randomized trial of three diabetes registry implementation strategies in a community internal medicine practice.
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2002 Aug;28(8):441-50. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(02)28044-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 25;3(3):CD000259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.pub4.
3
Screening for Nephropathy in Pediatric Type 2 Diabetes: Quality Improvement to Increase Nephropathy Screening.
Pediatr Qual Saf. 2024 May 27;9(3):e734. doi: 10.1097/pq9.0000000000000734. eCollection 2024 May-Jun.
4
Cardiac rehabilitation registries around the globe: current status and future needs.
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2024 Nov 18;31(16):e117-e121. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwae182.
5
Assessment of activities and participation of people by rehabilitation-focused clinical registries: a systematic scoping review.
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2023 Oct;59(5):640-652. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.23.07895-4. Epub 2023 Sep 18.
6
Quality improvement strategies for diabetes care: Effects on outcomes for adults living with diabetes.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 31;5(5):CD014513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014513.
7
Systematic review and narrative synthesis of computerized audit and feedback systems in healthcare.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2022 May 11;29(6):1106-1119. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocac031.
9
National diabetes registries: do they make a difference?
Acta Diabetol. 2021 Mar;58(3):267-278. doi: 10.1007/s00592-020-01576-8. Epub 2020 Aug 8.
10
Manually-generated reminders delivered on paper: effects on professional practice and patient outcomes.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 18;12(12):CD001174. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001174.pub4.

本文引用的文献

1
Web-based proactive system to improve breast cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.
Arch Intern Med. 2007 Mar 26;167(6):606-11. doi: 10.1001/archinte.167.6.606.
2
Brief report: The prevalence and use of chronic disease registries in physician organizations. A national survey.
J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Sep;20(9):855-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0171.x.
3
Teaching and improving quality of care in a primary care internal medicine residency clinic.
Acad Med. 2005 Jun;80(6):571-7. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200506000-00012.
4
Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(3):CD000259. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000259.
5
The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States.
N Engl J Med. 2003 Jun 26;348(26):2635-45. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa022615.
8
Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, Part 2.
JAMA. 2002 Oct 16;288(15):1909-14. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.15.1909.
9
A randomized trial of three diabetes registry implementation strategies in a community internal medicine practice.
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2002 Aug;28(8):441-50. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(02)28044-x.
10
Improving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action.
Health Aff (Millwood). 2001 Nov-Dec;20(6):64-78. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.20.6.64.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验