Wijeysundera Duminda N, Beattie W Scott, Rao Vivek, Granton John T, Chan Christopher T
Department of Anesthesia, Toronto General Hospital & University of Toronto, EN 3-450, 200 Elizabeth Street, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2C4, Canada.
Can J Anaesth. 2007 Nov;54(11):872-81. doi: 10.1007/BF03026790.
N-acetylcysteine may prevent acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery. To determine if N-acetylcysteine warrants definitive evaluation in a large multicentre trial, we evaluated its effects on a surrogate outcome, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), in a randomized trial.
One-hundred-seventy-seven cardiac surgery patients with moderate pre-existing renal insufficiency (eGFR <or= 60 mLxmin(-1)) were recruited in a blinded (patients, clinicians, data-collectors) placebo-controlled randomized trial. Eighty-nine were randomized to N-acetylcysteine (100 mgxkg(-1) i.v. bolus, 20 mgxkg(-1)xhr(-1) infusion until four hours after cardiopulmonary bypass), and 88 to placebo. The primary outcome was the percent change in eGFR during the first 72 postoperative hours. Secondary outcomes included renal replacement therapy, mortality, atrial fibrillation, vasoactive medications, and adverse effects. A future multicentre trial was deemed to be warranted if N-acetylcysteine was associated with a percent change in eGFR that was 3.8 better (small benefit), and with an upper 95% confidence interval including 9.5 (moderate benefit).
The median percent change in eGFR was 5.2% better (absolute difference) in the N-acetylcysteine arm (95% confidence interval 2.4% worse to 12.1% better; P=0.22). With regard to secondary outcomes, all-cause mortality was lower in the N-acetylcysteine arm (0% vs 8%; P=0.007).
N-acetylcysteine did not cause a statistically significant improvement in postoperative eGFR in this single-centre study. Nonetheless, its treatment effect was consistent with a plausible small-to-moderate benefit. Given this finding, N-acetylcysteine should be definitively evaluated in a large randomized trial.
N-乙酰半胱氨酸可能预防心脏手术后的急性肾损伤。为了确定N-乙酰半胱氨酸是否值得在一项大型多中心试验中进行确定性评估,我们在一项随机试验中评估了其对替代结局——估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)的影响。
177例术前存在中度肾功能不全(eGFR≤60 mL·min⁻¹)的心脏手术患者被纳入一项双盲(患者、临床医生、数据收集者)、安慰剂对照的随机试验。89例患者被随机分配至N-乙酰半胱氨酸组(静脉推注100 mg·kg⁻¹,然后以20 mg·kg⁻¹·h⁻¹持续输注直至体外循环后4小时),88例患者被随机分配至安慰剂组。主要结局是术后72小时内eGFR的变化百分比。次要结局包括肾脏替代治疗、死亡率、心房颤动、血管活性药物使用及不良反应。如果N-乙酰半胱氨酸与eGFR变化百分比改善3.8%(小益处)相关,且95%置信区间上限包括9.5%(中度益处),则认为有必要开展未来的多中心试验。
N-乙酰半胱氨酸组eGFR变化百分比中位数改善了5.2%(绝对差异)(95%置信区间为恶化2.4%至改善12.1%;P=0.22)。关于次要结局,N-乙酰半胱氨酸组全因死亡率较低(0% vs 8%;P=0.007)。
在这项单中心研究中,N-乙酰半胱氨酸并未使术后eGFR有统计学意义的改善。尽管如此,其治疗效果与可能的小至中度益处一致。鉴于这一发现,应在一项大型随机试验中对N-乙酰半胱氨酸进行确定性评估。