Sharma Adrija, Komistek Richard D, Scuderi Giles R, Cates Harold E
Center for Musculoskeletal Research, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007 Nov;464:117-26. doi: 10.1097/BLO.0b013e318157e478.
To accommodate for high flexion, new total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) have been designed. Unlike older designs which have been found to exhibit decreasing contact area with increasing flexion, we hypothesized the new designs would be associated with improved contact mechanics. We compared in vivo contact mechanics for 10 subjects having a fixed-bearing high-flexion posterior-stabilized (LPS-Flex) TKA and 10 subjects having a fixed-bearing high-flexion posterior cruciate-retaining (CR-Flex) TKA. All subjects performed deep knee bends to maximum flexion while under fluoroscopic surveillance. In vivo kinematics obtained using a three-dimensional to two-dimensional registration technique, were input into a three-dimensional inverse dynamic mathematical model to determine the contact forces. The contact areas and contact stresses were determined using a deformable contact model. The contact forces, contact areas, and contact stresses in both these implants increased with increasing flexion. The medial contact area in the LPS-Flex was higher than the CR-Flex for most of the flexion cycle. The lateral contact area was higher in the CR-Flex than the LPS-Flex in early and midflexion ranges. Although the lateral contact stresses were similar in both implants, the CR-Flex experienced higher medial contact stress than the LPS-Flex throughout flexion. However, both these implants were able to maintain sufficient contact area so the contact stress values were well below the yield strength of crosslinked polyethylene.
为适应高屈曲度,已设计出新型全膝关节置换术(TKA)。与已发现随着屈曲度增加接触面积会减小的旧设计不同,我们推测新设计将与改善的接触力学相关。我们比较了10名接受固定平台高屈曲后稳定型(LPS - Flex)TKA的受试者和10名接受固定平台高屈曲后交叉韧带保留型(CR - Flex)TKA的受试者的体内接触力学情况。所有受试者在透视监测下进行深度屈膝至最大屈曲度。使用三维到二维配准技术获得的体内运动学数据被输入到三维逆动力学数学模型中以确定接触力。使用可变形接触模型确定接触面积和接触应力。这两种植入物中的接触力、接触面积和接触应力均随屈曲度增加而增加。在大多数屈曲周期中,LPS - Flex的内侧接触面积高于CR - Flex。在屈曲早期和中期范围内,CR - Flex的外侧接触面积高于LPS - Flex。尽管两种植入物的外侧接触应力相似,但在整个屈曲过程中,CR - Flex的内侧接触应力高于LPS - Flex。然而,这两种植入物都能够保持足够的接触面积,因此接触应力值远低于交联聚乙烯的屈服强度。