Hébert L J, De Serres S J, Arsenault A B
Research Center, Montreal Rehabilitation Institute, Quebec, Canada.
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1991 Dec;31(8):483-8.
The aim of this study was to determine if the antagonist activity of the triceps brachii (TB) and anconeus (AN) muscles is modulated when the activity of the biceps brachii (BB) and brachioradialis (BR) is modulated by the performance of combined tasks and to verify if this behavior is similar at different elbow angles. Electromyographic (EMG) activity of BB, BR, AN and TB was recorded for normal subjects (N = 6) with surface electrodes during a ramp isometric contraction in elbow flexion (F) which was performed alone or combined with 20% of maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) in pronation (P) or in supination (S). Two cocontraction ratios, using the EMG root mean square (rms) values of each muscle and identified as BB/TB and BR/AN were calculated. The results indicate that for low flexion torque levels, the BB/TB ratio is higher for the S-F condition while the BR/AN ratio is higher during the pure flexion task. Variations of the EMG activity across tasks were significant only for BB (Friedman ANOVA, p less than .01) whereas there was no significant change in EMG activity (rms) for TB, BR and AN (Friedman ANOVA, p greater than .01). Furthermore, the behavior of both ratios across tasks was similar at 50 degrees, 90 degrees and 130 degrees of elbow flexion. Thus, for isometric conditions, there appears to be no evidence of modulation of EMG activity of elbow extensors while performing combined tasks of S-F and P-F. In addition, cocontraction activity during these tasks tends to be similar across elbow angles.
本研究的目的是确定当肱二头肌(BB)和肱桡肌(BR)的活动通过联合任务的执行受到调制时,肱三头肌(TB)和肘肌(AN)的拮抗肌活动是否受到调制,并验证这种行为在不同肘角度是否相似。在正常受试者(N = 6)进行肘部屈曲(F)的斜坡等长收缩时,使用表面电极记录BB、BR、AN和TB的肌电图(EMG)活动,该收缩单独进行或与旋前(P)或旋后(S)时20%的最大自主收缩(MVC)联合进行。计算了两个共同收缩比率,使用每块肌肉的EMG均方根(rms)值,分别确定为BB/TB和BR/AN。结果表明,对于低屈曲扭矩水平,在S-F条件下BB/TB比率较高,而在纯屈曲任务期间BR/AN比率较高。跨任务的EMG活动变化仅对BB有显著意义(Friedman方差分析,p小于.01),而TB、BR和AN的EMG活动(rms)没有显著变化(Friedman方差分析,p大于.01)。此外,在肘部屈曲50度、90度和130度时,两个比率跨任务的行为相似。因此,对于等长条件,在执行S-F和P-F联合任务时,似乎没有证据表明肘伸肌的EMG活动受到调制。此外,在这些任务期间,共同收缩活动在不同肘角度往往相似。