Hermans M H
ConvaTec, Princeton, N.Y.
Int J Sports Med. 1991 Dec;12(6):581-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1024738.
Abrasions in cyclists were either treated with an occlusive hydrocolloid dressing or with tulle gauze. The main object of the study was to investigate practical questions, e.g: Could the cyclists go on racing without their injuries impeding their progress? Medical aspects evaluated in the study were: the healing time and the infection rate of the wounds. Twenty-three racing cyclists with 38 abrasions were treated with a hydrocolloid dressing and 41 abrasions in 24 cyclists with tulle gauze. The results of the study show that the occlusive dressing produces a shorter healing time (5.6 days) than the tulle gauze (8.9 days), with smaller risks of infection (0% and 10%, respectively) and a longer wearing period per dressing. The hydrocolloid dressing also gives more pain relief than the tulle gauze (91% no pain during racing with the hydrocolloid dressing, 30% with the tulle gauze) and a higher overall comfort (very comfortable to comfortable versus uncomfortable to moderately uncomfortable, respectively).
自行车运动员的擦伤要么用封闭性水胶体敷料治疗，要么用薄纱绷带治疗。该研究的主要目的是调查实际问题，例如：自行车运动员受伤后能否继续比赛而不受损伤影响？该研究评估的医学方面包括：伤口的愈合时间和感染率。23名有38处擦伤的自行车赛车手用了水胶体敷料治疗，24名有41处擦伤的自行车赛车手用了薄纱绷带治疗。研究结果表明，封闭性敷料的愈合时间（5.6天）比薄纱绷带（8.9天）短，感染风险更小（分别为0%和10%），每次敷料的佩戴时间更长。水胶体敷料比薄纱绷带缓解疼痛的效果更好（使用水胶体敷料比赛时91%无痛，使用薄纱绷带时为30%无痛），总体舒适度更高（分别为非常舒适到舒适，以及不舒服到中度不舒服）。
