• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Readers' and author's responses to "whatever happened to plausibility as the basis for clinical research and practice after EBM and CAM rushed in?".

作者信息

Miller Howard L

出版信息

MedGenMed. 2007;9(2):57; author reply 57.

PMID:17977085
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Readers' and author's responses to "whatever happened to plausibility as the basis for clinical research and practice after EBM and CAM rushed in?".读者及作者对“循证医学和补充替代医学涌入后，基于合理性的临床研究与实践究竟何去何从？”一文的回应
MedGenMed. 2007;9(2):57; author reply 57.
2
Readers' and author's responses to "whatever happened to plausibility as the basis for clinical research and practice after EBM and CAM rushed in?".读者及作者对《循证医学与补充替代医学涌入后，以合理性作为临床研究与实践基础的情况究竟如何？》一文的回应
MedGenMed. 2007;9(2):57; author reply 57.
3
Readers' and author's responses to "whatever happened to plausibility as the basis for clinical research and practice after EBM and CAM rushed in?".读者及作者对“循证医学和补充替代医学涌入后，基于合理性的临床研究与实践究竟何去何从？”一文的回应
MedGenMed. 2007;9(2):57; author reply 57.
4
Readers' and author's responses to "whatever happened to plausibility as the basis for clinical research and practice after EBM and CAM rushed in?".读者和作者对“循证医学和补充替代医学涌入后，基于合理性的临床研究与实践究竟何去何从？”一文的回应。
MedGenMed. 2007;9(2):57; author reply 57.
5
Whatever happened to plausibility as the basis for clinical research and practice after EBM and CAM rushed in?在循证医学和补充替代医学迅速兴起之后，以合理性作为临床研究和实践基础的情况究竟如何了呢？
MedGenMed. 2007 Jan 26;9(1):19.
6
Readers' and author's responses to "whatever happened to plausibility as the basis for clinical research and practice after EBM and CAM rushed in?".读者及作者对“循证医学和补充替代医学盛行后，基于合理性的临床研究与实践究竟何去何从？”一文的回应
MedGenMed. 2007 Jun 13;9(2):57; author reply 57.
7
Scientific evidence and medical practice: The "Drunkard's Walk".科学证据与医学实践：《醉汉的脚步》
Arch Intern Med. 2009 Apr 13;169(7):649-50. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.4.
8
Readers' and author's responses to "Evidence-based standards should apply to dietary supplements, too".读者和作者对《循证标准也应适用于膳食补充剂》的回应。
MedGenMed. 2007;9(4):21; author reply 21.
9
Readers' and author's responses to "Evidence-based standards should apply to dietary supplements, too".读者及作者对《循证标准也应适用于膳食补充剂》的回应。
MedGenMed. 2007;9(4):21; author reply 21.
10
Readers' and author's responses to "The disappearing patient".读者和作者对《消失的患者》的回应。
MedGenMed. 2007;9(4):14; author reply 14.