• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Readers' and author's responses to "whatever happened to plausibility as the basis for clinical research and practice after EBM and CAM rushed in?".

作者信息

Varner John

出版信息

MedGenMed. 2007;9(2):57; author reply 57.

PMID:17977086
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Readers' and author's responses to "whatever happened to plausibility as the basis for clinical research and practice after EBM and CAM rushed in?".读者及作者对“循证医学和补充替代医学涌入后，基于合理性的临床研究与实践究竟何去何从？”一文的回应
MedGenMed. 2007;9(2):57; author reply 57.
2
Readers' and author's responses to "whatever happened to plausibility as the basis for clinical research and practice after EBM and CAM rushed in?".读者及作者对《循证医学与补充替代医学涌入后，以合理性作为临床研究与实践基础的情况究竟如何？》一文的回应
MedGenMed. 2007;9(2):57; author reply 57.
3
Readers' and author's responses to "whatever happened to plausibility as the basis for clinical research and practice after EBM and CAM rushed in?".读者及作者对“循证医学和补充替代医学涌入后，基于合理性的临床研究与实践究竟何去何从？”一文的回应
MedGenMed. 2007;9(2):57; author reply 57.
4
Readers' and author's responses to "whatever happened to plausibility as the basis for clinical research and practice after EBM and CAM rushed in?".读者和作者对“循证医学和补充替代医学涌入后，基于合理性的临床研究与实践究竟何去何从？”一文的回应。
MedGenMed. 2007;9(2):57; author reply 57.
5
Whatever happened to plausibility as the basis for clinical research and practice after EBM and CAM rushed in?在循证医学和补充替代医学迅速兴起之后，以合理性作为临床研究和实践基础的情况究竟如何了呢？
MedGenMed. 2007 Jan 26;9(1):19.
6
Readers' and author's responses to "whatever happened to plausibility as the basis for clinical research and practice after EBM and CAM rushed in?".读者及作者对“循证医学和补充替代医学盛行后，基于合理性的临床研究与实践究竟何去何从？”一文的回应
MedGenMed. 2007 Jun 13;9(2):57; author reply 57.
7
Scientific evidence and medical practice: The "Drunkard's Walk".科学证据与医学实践：《醉汉的脚步》
Arch Intern Med. 2009 Apr 13;169(7):649-50. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.4.
8
Readers' and author's responses to "Evidence-based standards should apply to dietary supplements, too".读者和作者对《循证标准也应适用于膳食补充剂》的回应。
MedGenMed. 2007;9(4):21; author reply 21.
9
Readers' and author's responses to "Evidence-based standards should apply to dietary supplements, too".读者及作者对《循证标准也应适用于膳食补充剂》的回应。
MedGenMed. 2007;9(4):21; author reply 21.
10
Readers' and author's responses to "The disappearing patient".读者和作者对《消失的患者》的回应。
MedGenMed. 2007;9(4):14; author reply 14.