• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2003年美国子宫切除术的发生率

Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003.

作者信息

Wu Jennifer M, Wechter Mary Ellen, Geller Elizabeth J, Nguyen Thao V, Visco Anthony G

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Nov;110(5):1091-5. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000285997.38553.4b.

DOI:10.1097/01.AOG.0000285997.38553.4b
PMID:17978124
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To estimate hysterectomy rates by type of hysterectomy and to compare age, length of stay, and regional variation in type of hysterectomy performed for benign indications.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of national discharge data using the 2003 Nationwide Inpatient Sample. These data represent a 20% stratified sample of U.S. hospitals. Women aged 16 years or older who underwent a hysterectomy were identified by International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification procedure codes. We extracted data regarding age, race, diagnoses codes, length of stay, and hospital characteristics. Using 2000 National Census data and weighted data analysis for cluster sampling, we calculated hysterectomy rates.

RESULTS

In 2003, 602,457 hysterectomies were performed, for a rate of 5.38 per 1,000 women-years. Of the 538,722 hysterectomies for benign disease (rate 4.81 per 1,000 women-years), the abdominal route was the most common (66.1%), followed by vaginal (21.8%) and laparoscopic (11.8%) routes. Mean ages (+/-standard deviation) differed among hysterectomy types (abdominal 44.5+/-0.1 years, vaginal 48.2+/-0.2 years, and laparoscopic 43.6+/-0.3 years, P<.001). Mean lengths of stay (+/-standard deviation) were also different (3.0+/-0.03 days, 2.0+/-0.03 days, 1.7+/-0.03 days, respectively, P<.001). The hysterectomy rate was highest in the South (5.92 per 1,000 women-years) and lowest in the Northeast (3.33 per 1,000 women-years).

CONCLUSION

Despite a shorter length of stay, vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomies remain far less common than abdominal hysterectomy for benign disease.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

摘要

目的

按子宫切除术类型估算子宫切除率,并比较因良性指征行子宫切除术患者的年龄、住院时间及手术类型的地区差异。

方法

我们使用2003年全国住院患者样本对全国出院数据进行横断面分析。这些数据代表美国医院20%的分层样本。通过国际疾病分类第九版临床修订版手术编码识别16岁及以上接受子宫切除术的女性。我们提取了有关年龄、种族、诊断编码、住院时间和医院特征的数据。利用2000年全国人口普查数据和整群抽样的加权数据分析,我们计算了子宫切除率。

结果

2003年,共进行了602457例子宫切除术,每1000妇女年的发生率为5.38例。在538722例因良性疾病行子宫切除术的患者中(每1000妇女年发生率为4.81例),经腹途径最为常见(66.1%),其次是经阴道途径(21.8%)和腹腔镜途径(11.8%)。不同子宫切除术类型的平均年龄(±标准差)有所不同(经腹44.5±0.1岁,经阴道48.2±0.2岁,腹腔镜43.6±0.3岁,P<0.001)。平均住院时间(±标准差)也不同(分别为3.0±0.03天、2.0±0.03天、1.7±0.03天,P<0.001)。子宫切除率在南部最高(每1000妇女年5.92例),在东北部最低(每1000妇女年3.33例)。

结论

尽管经阴道和腹腔镜子宫切除术住院时间较短,但对于良性疾病,其仍远不如经腹子宫切除术常见。

证据级别

III级。

相似文献

1
Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003.2003年美国子宫切除术的发生率
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Nov;110(5):1091-5. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000285997.38553.4b.
2
[Hysterectomy for benign lesions in the north of France: epidemiology and postoperative events].[法国北部良性病变子宫切除术:流行病学及术后情况]
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2001 Apr;30(2):151-9.
3
Persistent high rates of hysterectomy in Western Australia: a population-based study of 83 000 procedures over 23 years.西澳大利亚州子宫切除术的持续高比率:一项基于人群的研究,涉及23年间的83000例手术。
BJOG. 2006 Jul;113(7):804-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00962.x.
4
Hysterectomy in obese women: a comparison of abdominal and vaginal routes.肥胖女性的子宫切除术:腹部与阴道途径的比较
Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Oct;104(4):710-4. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000140685.30899.24.
5
National trends and determinants of hospitalization costs and lengths-of-stay for uterine fibroids procedures.子宫肌瘤手术住院费用和住院时长的全国趋势及影响因素。
J Health Care Finance. 2007 Spring;33(3):1-16.
6
Clinical outcomes and resource utilization associated with laparoscopic and open colectomy using a large national database.利用大型国家数据库研究腹腔镜与开腹结肠切除术的临床结局及资源利用情况。
Ann Surg. 2008 May;247(5):819-24. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31816d950e.
7
Hysterectomy rates for benign indications.良性指征的子宫切除率。
Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jun;107(6):1278-83. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000210640.86628.ff.
8
Open abdominal versus laparoscopic and vaginal hysterectomy: analysis of a large United States payer measuring quality and cost of care.开放性腹部子宫切除术与腹腔镜及阴道子宫切除术:对美国一家大型医保机构护理质量与成本的分析
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2009 Sep-Oct;16(5):581-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.06.018.
9
Average charges for three types of hysterectomy procedures: United States, 1998.1998年美国三种子宫切除手术的平均费用。
Stat Bull Metrop Insur Co. 2000 Apr-Jun;81(2):27-36.
10
Hysterectomy on benign indications in Sweden 1987-2003: a nationwide trend analysis.1987 - 2003年瑞典良性指征子宫切除术:一项全国性趋势分析。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(1):52-8. doi: 10.1080/00016340802596017.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluating treatment options for symptomatic uterine fibroids: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effectiveness, recovery, and long-term outcomes (MARIE WP1).评估有症状子宫肌瘤的治疗方案:有效性、恢复情况及长期结局的系统评价和荟萃分析(MARIE项目工作包1)
Front Glob Womens Health. 2025 Jul 31;6:1601341. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2025.1601341. eCollection 2025.
2
Breast Cancer Risk After Hysterectomy: A Health Insurance Database-Based Analysis.子宫切除术后的乳腺癌风险:基于健康保险数据库的分析
J Breast Cancer. 2025 Aug;28(4):215-227. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2025.0031. Epub 2025 Jun 16.
3
Minilaparoscopic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Insights from a Single-Center Retrospective Cohort Study with Legal Considerations.
迷你腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜子宫切除术:来自一项单中心回顾性队列研究的见解及法律考量
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jul 3;61(7):1216. doi: 10.3390/medicina61071216.
4
Biologically-Based Notions About Uterine Bleeding During Myomectomy: Reasoning on Tradition and New Concepts.关于子宫肌瘤切除术期间子宫出血的生物学概念:对传统观念和新概念的思考
Med Sci (Basel). 2025 Jun 1;13(2):68. doi: 10.3390/medsci13020068.
5
Analyzing 10-year time trends for Hysterectomy and Oophorectomy: Focus on Endometrial sampling and risk factors for Endometrial Cancer.分析子宫切除术和卵巢切除术的10年时间趋势:关注子宫内膜取样及子宫内膜癌的危险因素。
Malawi Med J. 2024 Jul 30;36(2):144-153. doi: 10.4314/mmj.v36i2.12. eCollection 2024 Jul.
6
Assessment of a novel unidirectional mid-term absorbable barbed suture versus a competitor barbed suture for vaginal cuff closure after gynaecology surgery, study protocol of a randomized controlled trial - BARHYSTER.一项关于新型单向中期可吸收倒刺缝线与一种对照倒刺缝线用于妇科手术后阴道残端闭合的评估——随机对照试验BARHYSTER的研究方案
BMC Surg. 2025 Jan 14;25(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12893-024-02700-z.
7
Transvaginal natural orifice endoscopic surgery for hysterectomy: a prospective cohort study.经阴道自然腔道内镜手术用于子宫切除术:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Womens Health. 2024 Nov 29;24(1):631. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03461-w.
8
Uterine fibroids with heavy menstrual bleeding stratified by race in a commercial and Medicaid database.在一个商业和医疗补助数据库中,按种族分层的伴有月经过多的子宫肌瘤。
AJOG Glob Rep. 2024 Oct 17;4(4):100412. doi: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100412. eCollection 2024 Nov.
9
Minimally invasive hysterectomy same-day discharge: systematic review and meta-analysis of predictors.微创子宫切除术当日出院:预测因素的系统评价与荟萃分析
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Dec;310(6):2811-2822. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07794-7. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
10
Early outcomes of three new robotic surgical systems in patients undergoing hysterectomy.三种新型机器人手术系统在子宫切除术患者中的早期结果。
Updates Surg. 2024 Sep;76(5):2051-2057. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01891-7. Epub 2024 May 24.