Suppr超能文献

使用自适应观测器评估脑脊液流出传导性——实验与临床评估

Assessment of cerebrospinal fluid outflow conductance using an adaptive observer--experimental and clinical evaluation.

作者信息

Andersson K, Manchester I R, Andersson N, Shiriaev A, Malm J, Eklund A

机构信息

Department of Radiation Sciences, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

出版信息

Physiol Meas. 2007 Nov;28(11):1355-68. doi: 10.1088/0967-3334/28/11/003. Epub 2007 Oct 5.

Abstract

Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (INPH) patients have a disturbance in the dynamics of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) system. The outflow conductance, C, of the CSF system has been suggested to be prognostic for positive outcome after treatment with a CSF shunt. All current methods for estimation of C have drawbacks; these include lack of information on the accuracy and relatively long investigation times. Thus, there is a need for improved methods. To accomplish this, the theoretical framework for a new adaptive observer (OBS) was developed which provides real-time estimation of C. The aim of this study was to evaluate the OBS method and to compare it with the constant pressure infusion (CPI) method. The OBS method was applied to data from infusion investigations performed with the CPI method. These consisted of repeated measurements on an experimental set-up and 30 patients with suspected INPH. There was no significant difference in C between the CPI and the OBS method for the experimental set-up. For the patients there was a significant difference, -0.84+/-1.25 microl (s kPa)(-1), mean +/- SD (paired sample t-test, p<0.05). However, such a difference is within clinically acceptable limits. This encourages further development of this new real-time approach for estimation of the outflow conductance.

摘要

特发性正常压力脑积水(INPH)患者存在脑脊液(CSF)系统动力学紊乱。脑脊液系统的流出传导率C已被认为是脑脊液分流治疗后预后良好的指标。目前所有估算C的方法都存在缺陷,包括缺乏关于准确性的信息以及研究时间相对较长。因此,需要改进方法。为实现这一目标,开发了一种新的自适应观测器(OBS)的理论框架,可实时估算C。本研究的目的是评估OBS方法并将其与恒压输注(CPI)方法进行比较。OBS方法应用于采用CPI方法进行的输注研究数据。这些数据包括对一个实验装置的重复测量以及30例疑似INPH患者的数据。对于实验装置,CPI方法和OBS方法测得的C值无显著差异。对于患者,两者存在显著差异,差值为-0.84±1.25微升/(秒·千帕),均值±标准差(配对样本t检验,p<0.05)。然而,这种差异在临床可接受范围内。这鼓励进一步开发这种估算流出传导率的新实时方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验