Turnbull Ann P, Summers Jean Ann, Lee Suk-Hyang, Kyzar Kathleen
Beach Center on Disability, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KA 66045, USA.
Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2007;13(4):346-56. doi: 10.1002/mrdd.20174.
The purpose of this review is to (a) document the current status of conceptualizing and measuring family outcomes related to having a member with an intellectual disability and (b) determine the extent to which family research focuses on internal family characteristics as contrasted to external family support. The reviewers collected 28 articles using the terms well-being, adaptation, family functioning, or family quality of life in the title. Results of our analyses are presented as a comparison between well-being, adaptation, and family functioning articles in one group and family quality of life articles in a second group. Both groups lacked explicit conceptual definitions, theory, and random/representative samples. The articles placed an undue emphasis on maternal participation, and tended to report a single family member score as representative of the whole family. Two major differences between the groups was a tendency for family quality of life studies to be grounded in conceptual frameworks and focus on new instrument development. Recommendations for future research directions are included.
(a)记录与有智力残疾家庭成员相关的家庭结果的概念化和测量的现状,以及(b)确定家庭研究在多大程度上关注家庭内部特征,而非外部家庭支持。综述作者使用标题中包含幸福感、适应性、家庭功能或家庭生活质量等术语收集了28篇文章。我们的分析结果呈现为一组关于幸福感、适应性和家庭功能的文章与另一组关于家庭生活质量的文章之间的比较。两组文章均缺乏明确的概念定义、理论以及随机/代表性样本。这些文章过度强调母亲的参与,并且倾向于将单个家庭成员的分数作为整个家庭的代表。两组之间的两个主要差异在于,家庭生活质量研究倾向于基于概念框架,并专注于新工具的开发。文中还包含了对未来研究方向的建议。