Ratikainen Irja I, Gill Jennifer A, Gunnarsson Tómas G, Sutherland William J, Kokko Hanna
Laboratory of Ecological and Evolutionary Dynamics, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, PO Box 65 University of Helsinki, 00014 Helsinki, Finland.
Ecol Lett. 2008 Feb;11(2):184-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01122.x. Epub 2007 Nov 3.
Most organisms live in changing environments or do not use the same resources at different stages of their lives or in different seasons. As a result, density dependence will affect populations differently at different times. Such sequential density dependence generates markedly different population responses compared to the unrealistic assumption that all events occur simultaneously. Various field studies have also shown that the conditions that individuals experience during one period can influence success and per capita vital rates during the following period. These carry-over effects further complicate any general principles and increase the diversity of possible population dynamics. In this review, we describe how studies of sequential density dependence have diverged in directions that are both taxon-specific and have non-overlapping terminology, despite very similar underlying problems. By exploring and highlighting these similarities, we aim to improve communication between fields, clarify common misunderstandings, and provide a framework for improving conservation and management practices, including sustainable harvesting theory.
大多数生物生活在不断变化的环境中,或者在其生命的不同阶段或不同季节使用不同的资源。因此,密度制约在不同时间对种群的影响会有所不同。与所有事件同时发生这一不切实际的假设相比,这种顺序性密度制约会产生明显不同的种群反应。各种实地研究还表明,个体在某一时期所经历的条件会影响下一时期的成功率和人均生命率。这些遗留效应使任何一般原则进一步复杂化,并增加了可能的种群动态的多样性。在这篇综述中,我们描述了尽管潜在问题非常相似,但顺序性密度制约的研究如何在特定分类群且术语不重叠的方向上出现了分歧。通过探索和突出这些相似之处,我们旨在改善不同领域之间的交流,澄清常见的误解,并提供一个框架来改进保护和管理实践,包括可持续捕捞理论。