Riggs Paula D, Mikulich-Gilbertson Susan K, Davies Robert D, Lohman Michelle, Klein Constance, Stover Shannon K
Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, Denver, CO 80262, USA.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 Nov;161(11):1026-34. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.161.11.1026.
To evaluate the effect of fluoxetine hydrochloride vs placebo on major depressive disorder, substance use disorder (SUD), and conduct disorder (CD) in adolescents receiving cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) for SUD.
Randomized controlled trial.
A single-site study conducted between May 2001 and August 2004.
One hundred twenty-six adolescents aged 13 to 19 years recruited from the community and meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fourth Edition) diagnostic criteria for current major depressive disorder, lifetime CD, and at least 1 nontobacco SUD.
Sixteen weeks of fluoxetine hydrochloride, 20 mg/d, or placebo, with CBT.
For depression, Childhood Depression Rating Scale-Revised and Clinical Global Impression Improvement; for SUD, self-reported nontobacco substance use and urine substance use screen results in the past 30 days; and for CD, self-reported symptoms in the past 30 days.
Fluoxetine combined with CBT had greater efficacy than did placebo and CBT according to changes on the Childhood Depression Rating Scale-Revised (effect size, 0.78) but not on the Clinical Global Impression Improvement treatment response (76% and 67%, respectively; relative risk, 1.08). There was an overall decrease in self-reported substance use (4.31 days; 95% confidence interval, 2.12-6.50) and CD symptoms (relative risk, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 0.82-1.59), but neither difference between groups was statistically significant. The proportion of substance-free weekly urine screen results was higher in the placebo-CBT group than in the fluoxetine-CBT group (mean difference, 2.10; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-4.15).
Fluoxetine and CBT had greater efficacy than did placebo and CBT on one but not both depression measures and was not associated with greater decline in self-reported substance use or CD symptoms. The CBT may have contributed to higher-than-expected treatment response and mixed efficacy findings, despite its focus on SUD.
评估盐酸氟西汀与安慰剂对接受针对物质使用障碍(SUD)的认知行为疗法(CBT)的青少年中重度抑郁症、物质使用障碍(SUD)和品行障碍(CD)的影响。
随机对照试验。
2001年5月至2004年8月进行的单中心研究。
从社区招募的126名13至19岁青少年,符合《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》(第四版)当前重度抑郁症、终生CD和至少一种非烟草SUD的诊断标准。
16周的盐酸氟西汀,20毫克/天,或安慰剂,联合CBT。
对于抑郁症,采用儿童抑郁评定量表修订版和临床总体印象改善情况;对于SUD,采用过去30天内自我报告的非烟草物质使用情况和尿液物质使用筛查结果;对于CD,采用过去30天内自我报告的症状。
根据儿童抑郁评定量表修订版的变化,氟西汀联合CBT比安慰剂联合CBT具有更高的疗效(效应量,0.78),但在临床总体印象改善治疗反应方面并非如此(分别为76%和67%;相对风险,1.08)。自我报告的物质使用(4.31天;95%置信区间,2.12 - 6.50)和CD症状(相对风险,1.20;95%置信区间,0.82 - 1.59)总体上有所下降,但两组之间的差异均无统计学意义。安慰剂 - CBT组无物质的每周尿液筛查结果比例高于氟西汀 - CBT组(平均差异,2.10;95%置信区间,0.37 - 4.15)。
氟西汀和CBT在一项而非两项抑郁测量指标上比安慰剂和CBT具有更高的疗效,且与自我报告的物质使用或CD症状的更大下降无关。尽管CBT侧重于SUD,但它可能导致了高于预期的治疗反应和混合的疗效结果。