Jain Ajay, Haisfield-Wolfe Mary Ellen, Lange Julie, Ahuja Nita, Khouri Nagi, Tsangaris Theodore, Zhang Zhe, Balch Charles, Jacobs Lisa K
Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Feb;15(2):462-71. doi: 10.1245/s10434-007-9623-1. Epub 2007 Nov 6.
As a complement to sentinel node dissection (SLND), we evaluated ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (USFNA) of normal and abnormal axillary nodes in breast cancer patients. We hypothesized that USFNA would be accurate for primary breast tumors larger than 2 cm.
We retrospectively reviewed 68 patients who underwent 69 preoperative USFNAs from 2003 to 2005. The results of 65 preoperative USFNA were compared with the results of SLND or axillary node dissection (ALND) for concordance. Four USFNAs were excluded from analysis because of a complete response to neoadjuvant therapy. We evaluated whether primary tumor features (histology, size, grade, vascular invasion, estrogen/progesterone receptor status and Her-2-neu status) predicted concordance of USFNA results and the final lymph node pathology.
Of 65 axillae analyzed, 39 (60%) were positive, four (6%) were non-diagnostic, and 22 (34%) were negative by USFNA. USFNA had 89% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 100% positive predictive value (PPV) in patients with palpable or ultrasonographically suspicious nodes. USFNA sensitivity dropped significantly for nonpalpable, ultrasonographically normal nodes (54%), while specificity and PPV remained 100%. None of the primary tumor features predicted concordance of USFNA and SLND/ALND.
USFNA of axillary nodes has a high specificity and PPV in clinically or radiologically suspicious nodes. Sensitivity of USFNA is low for nodes of normal appearance, but positive USFNA may allow definitive management of the axilla without a SLND. Thus, USFNA of normal appearing nodes might be beneficial in cases where decisions regarding neoadjuvant chemotherapy would be affected by the results.
作为前哨淋巴结清扫术(SLND)的一种补充手段,我们评估了超声引导下对乳腺癌患者正常及异常腋窝淋巴结进行细针穿刺抽吸活检(USFNA)的情况。我们推测,对于直径大于2cm的原发性乳腺肿瘤,USFNA检查结果会是准确的。
我们回顾性分析了2003年至2005年间接受69例术前USFNA检查的68例患者。将65例术前USFNA检查结果与SLND或腋窝淋巴结清扫术(ALND)结果进行对比,以判断二者的一致性。由于对新辅助治疗有完全反应,4例USFNA检查被排除在分析之外。我们评估了原发性肿瘤特征(组织学、大小、分级、血管侵犯、雌激素/孕激素受体状态及人表皮生长因子受体2(Her-2-neu)状态)是否能预测USFNA检查结果与最终淋巴结病理结果的一致性。
在分析的65个腋窝样本中,USFNA检查显示39个(60%)为阳性,4个(6%)为无法诊断,22个(34%)为阴性。对于可触及或超声检查可疑的淋巴结,USFNA检查的敏感性为89%,特异性为100%,阳性预测值(PPV)为100%。对于不可触及、超声检查正常的淋巴结,USFNA检查的敏感性显著下降(54%),而特异性和PPV仍为100%。原发性肿瘤的各项特征均不能预测USFNA检查结果与SLND/ALND结果的一致性。
对于临床或放射学检查可疑的淋巴结,腋窝淋巴结USFNA检查具有较高的特异性和PPV。对于外观正常的淋巴结,USFNA检查的敏感性较低,但阳性的USFNA检查结果可能使腋窝无需进行SLND即可得到明确处理。因此,对于新辅助化疗决策会受检查结果影响的病例,对外观正常的淋巴结进行USFNA检查可能有益。