Suppr超能文献

美国影响堕胎的法律及其对女性健康的影响。

The laws that affect abortion in the United States and their impact on women's health.

作者信息

Harrison L K, Naylor K L

机构信息

Kaiser Permanente, Honolulu.

出版信息

Nurse Pract. 1991 Dec;16(12):53-9. doi: 10.1097/00006205-199112000-00013.

Abstract

Abortion has been a hotly contested political issue since the mid 1960s, when states began liberalizing their abortion laws. Recent Supreme Court rulings, such as Rust vs. Sullivan, the retirement of two liberal Supreme Court justices and the battle over Louisiana's abortion legislation have created new fervor on both fronts of the battle. All health care providers who care for women need to be cognizant of the current abortion laws and the factors that influence the abortion decision. These factors include the different levels of health risk and financial implications posed by continued pregnancy or abortion. Historically, numerous court cases have influenced women's health care, and reviews of several significant cases are provided. The Webster vs. Reproductive Health Services decision was the first case that directly challenged the Roe vs. Wade decision. The Webster decision enables states to have greater authority in writing their own abortion laws. Individual state laws can vary greatly, so it is vitally important for providers to know and understand the laws of their state.

摘要

自20世纪60年代中期各州开始放宽堕胎法律以来,堕胎一直是一个备受争议的政治问题。最近的最高法院裁决,如“拉斯特诉沙利文案”、两位自由派最高法院大法官的退休以及路易斯安那州堕胎立法之争,在这场斗争的两个阵营都引发了新的热潮。所有照顾女性的医疗服务提供者都需要了解当前的堕胎法律以及影响堕胎决定的因素。这些因素包括继续怀孕或堕胎所带来的不同程度的健康风险和经济影响。从历史上看,众多法庭案件都对女性医疗保健产生了影响,本文提供了对几起重大案件的回顾。“韦伯斯特诉生殖健康服务案”的裁决是第一个直接挑战“罗诉韦德案”裁决的案件。“韦伯斯特案”的裁决使各州在制定自己的堕胎法律方面拥有更大的权力。各州的法律差异可能很大,因此对于医疗服务提供者来说,了解和理解本州的法律至关重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验