女性在堕胎法理学中的角色：从罗诉韦德案到凯西案及以后。 - Suppr

Suppr

超能文献

The role of women in abortion jurisprudence: from Roe to Casey and beyond.

作者信息

Martin P A

机构信息

University of San Francisco.

出版信息

Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1993 Summer;2(3):309-19. doi: 10.1017/s096318010000431x.

DOI:10.1017/s096318010000431x

PMID:8293219

Abstract

摘要

相似文献

The role of women in abortion jurisprudence: from Roe to Casey and beyond.

Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1993 Summer;2(3):309-19. doi: 10.1017/s096318010000431x.

Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.

Womens Health Issues. 1993 Fall;3(3):162-70. doi: 10.1016/s1049-3867(05)80251-8.

Abortion on the Supreme Court agenda: Planned Parenthood v. Casey and its possible consequences.

Law Med Health Care. 1992 Fall;20(3):243-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1992.tb01197.x.

Casey and the resuscitation of Roe v. Wade.

Hastings Cent Rep. 1992 Sep-Oct;22(5):24-8.

Court reaffirms Roe but upholds restrictions.

Fam Plann Perspect. 1992 Jul-Aug;24(4):174-7, 185.

Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.

J Leg Med. 1995 Dec;16(4):607-36. doi: 10.1080/01947649509510995.

Legal aspects of abortion practice.

Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1986 Mar;13(1):135-43.

The Supreme Court, abortion, and the jurisprudence of class.

Am J Public Health. 1992 Nov;82(11):1556-62. doi: 10.2105/ajph.82.11.1556.

Abortion and legal process in the United States: an overview of the post-Webster legal landscape.

Law Med Health Care. 1989 Winter;17(4):368-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1989.tb01118.x.

Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.

Wests Supreme Court Report. 1992 Jun 29;112:2791-885.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述，助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型，支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验

相似文献

The role of women in abortion jurisprudence: from Roe to Casey and beyond.

Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1993 Summer;2(3):309-19. doi: 10.1017/s096318010000431x.

Beyond Roe, after Casey: the present and future of a "fundamental" right.

Womens Health Issues. 1993 Fall;3(3):162-70. doi: 10.1016/s1049-3867(05)80251-8.

Abortion on the Supreme Court agenda: Planned Parenthood v. Casey and its possible consequences.

Law Med Health Care. 1992 Fall;20(3):243-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1992.tb01197.x.

Casey and the resuscitation of Roe v. Wade.

Hastings Cent Rep. 1992 Sep-Oct;22(5):24-8.

Court reaffirms Roe but upholds restrictions.

Fam Plann Perspect. 1992 Jul-Aug;24(4):174-7, 185.

Fetal viability as a threshold to personhood. A legal analysis.

J Leg Med. 1995 Dec;16(4):607-36. doi: 10.1080/01947649509510995.

Legal aspects of abortion practice.

Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1986 Mar;13(1):135-43.

The Supreme Court, abortion, and the jurisprudence of class.

Am J Public Health. 1992 Nov;82(11):1556-62. doi: 10.2105/ajph.82.11.1556.

Abortion and legal process in the United States: an overview of the post-Webster legal landscape.

Law Med Health Care. 1989 Winter;17(4):368-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1989.tb01118.x.

Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey.

Wests Supreme Court Report. 1992 Jun 29;112:2791-885.