Barei David P, Agel Julie, Swiontkowski Marc F
Harborview Medical Center, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.
J Orthop Trauma. 2007 Nov-Dec;21(10):738-42. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e31815bb30f.
The development of patient-oriented health status measurements has resulted in the emergence of several generic condition-specific and anatomic-specific instruments. These instruments are generally designed to measure the function of the individual as a whole from the individual's own point of view. They are not intended to replace traditional physician-oriented clinical outcome measures, such as complication rates, ranges of motion, or time to fracture union; instead, they are an attempt to measure the results of a treatment or condition from the patient's perspective. Over the past decade, the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (MFA) instrument has been developed and used as one of the primary generic musculoskeletal functional assessment tools, in part because of its validity, reliability, and responsiveness. Despite the numerous publications reporting the MFA/SMFA, we are unaware of any publications that have used those results to subsequently affect patient care. We hope that this special interest article highlights the current underutilization of the available data and encourages the orthopedic community to maximize the clinical and research potential of the MFA/SMFA (Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment).
以患者为导向的健康状况测量方法的发展,催生了几种通用的特定疾病和特定解剖部位的测量工具。这些工具通常旨在从个体自身的角度衡量个体整体的功能。它们并非旨在取代传统的以医生为导向的临床结局测量指标,如并发症发生率、活动范围或骨折愈合时间;相反,它们是试图从患者的角度衡量治疗或疾病的结果。在过去十年中,肌肉骨骼功能评估(MFA)工具得以开发,并被用作主要的通用肌肉骨骼功能评估工具之一,部分原因在于其有效性、可靠性和反应性。尽管有大量关于MFA/短肌肉骨骼功能评估(SMFA)的出版物,但我们并未发现有任何出版物将这些结果用于随后影响患者护理。我们希望这篇专题文章能凸显当前可用数据未得到充分利用的情况,并鼓励骨科界充分发挥MFA/SMFA的临床和研究潜力。