Suppr超能文献

肌肉骨骼功能评估工具:标准效度和结构效度。

Musculoskeletal Function Assessment instrument: criterion and construct validity.

作者信息

Engelberg R, Martin D P, Agel J, Obremsky W, Coronado G, Swiontkowski M F

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, University of Washington, Seattle 98195, USA.

出版信息

J Orthop Res. 1996 Mar;14(2):182-92. doi: 10.1002/jor.1100140204.

Abstract

The Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (MFA) instrument, a health status instrument with 100 self-reported health items, was designed for use with the broad range of patients with musculoskeletal disorders of the extremities commonly seen in clinical practice. In this paper, we report on its criterion and construct validity. Criterion validity was tested against physicians' ratings of patient functioning (e.g., upper functioning, lower functioning, daily activities, recreational functioning, emotional adjustment, and overall functioning) and standard clinical measures (e.g., grip strength, walking speed, fine motor skills, knee and elbow strength, and range of motion). Significant correlations (p < or = 0.05) between its scores, physicians' ratings, and clinical measures support the MFA's criterion validity. Construct validity was demonstrated against existing measures of health status (e.g., measures of lower and upper mobility, activity level and satisfaction, health status, social support, pain, emotional status, and quality of life), in accordance with clinical hypotheses about the effect of musculoskeletal disorders on functioning (e.g., type and number of problems, severity of illness or injury, and comorbidities) and by an analysis of demographic characteristics (e.g., sex, education, income, health insurance, and employment) against the MFA scores. Discriminant construct validity was supported in an analysis of MFA scores by patient disease groups (p < or = 0.01).

摘要

肌肉骨骼功能评估(MFA)工具是一种包含100个自我报告健康项目的健康状况工具,专为临床实践中常见的各种四肢肌肉骨骼疾病患者设计。在本文中,我们报告了其效标效度和结构效度。效标效度通过与医生对患者功能的评分(如上肢功能、下肢功能、日常活动、娱乐功能、情绪调整和整体功能)以及标准临床测量指标(如握力、步行速度、精细运动技能、膝关节和肘关节力量以及活动范围)进行对比测试。该工具得分与医生评分及临床测量指标之间存在显著相关性(p≤0.05),支持了MFA的效标效度。结构效度通过与现有健康状况测量指标(如下肢和上肢活动能力、活动水平和满意度、健康状况、社会支持、疼痛、情绪状态和生活质量)进行对比得以证明,这与关于肌肉骨骼疾病对功能影响的临床假设(如问题的类型和数量、疾病或损伤的严重程度以及合并症)相符,并且通过对人口统计学特征(如性别、教育程度、收入、健康保险和就业情况)与MFA得分进行分析得以证明。在对患者疾病组的MFA得分分析中,判别结构效度得到了支持(p≤0.01)。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验